• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Improper engine modification leads to fuel starvation

By NTSB · October 13, 2020 ·

The pilot of the tailwheel-equipped, amateur-built airplane, who was also an airframe and powerplant mechanic, reported that, during approach to a sandbar near Monroe, Washington, he side-slipped the Just Aircraft Highlander. The engine then lost power because he was “too aggressive with the throttle and pulled it enough to bend the [carburetor] idle stop screw bracket.”

The engine was normally quiet, the airplane was sound proofed, and the pilot also used a noise-cancelling headset, which prevented him from being aware of the power loss until he attempted to add power to no avail.

He did not have enough time to restart the engine, so the plane settled onto the water about 15 to 20 feet short of the sandbar. Subsequently, the airplane hydroplaned and then came to rest on the sandbar inverted.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing lift strut, left wing, and rudder.


The pilot reported that the reason he was aggressive with the throttle was because of a lean mixture that tended to overheat the engine during takeoff or cruise on hot days.

An FAA inspector reported that the pilot had modified the number and position of the last hole in the fuel spray bar. By doing so, he was able to get the engine to “barely run” to perform short-field landings. During the accident landing, it “must have cut off the flow of fuel enough to make the engine quit.”

The pilot reported that he had previously attempted to mechanically enrich the mixture by drilling holes in the fuel spray bar, but had drilled a hole “at the location where the engine wanted to idle,” meaning that, if the hole was open, the engine would idle high, and if the hole was closed, the engine would “die.” He added that it was not a problem unless he was trying to land short.

Probable cause: The pilot’s improper engine modification and operation, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation, and the pilot’s failure to maintain an adequate approach path, which resulted in the airplane landing short of the runway.

NTSB Identification: GAA19CA034

This October 2018 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Wayne says

    October 14, 2020 at 4:33 pm

    Drilled a hole in the wrong place?
    He’s an A&P?

  2. JimH in CA says

    October 14, 2020 at 3:09 pm

    ok,…a pilot, builder AND a fuel systems expert. I wonder how he determined where to drill the holes and how big to make them ? Then how to test the mods, maybe using a lambda meter ?

    It seems to me the better way to reduce the idle thrust would to use a controllable prop, and set the low pitch for zero or negative thrust.

  3. gbigs says

    October 14, 2020 at 5:39 am

    Not much of a pilot if he thought the engine RPM is a function of speed.

    • Warren Webb Jr says

      October 14, 2020 at 6:48 am

      As long as the engine can produce enough power to maintain the desired speed, that’s exactly what engine RPM is. It produces the thrust needed to offset the drag. If the engine can’t produce enough power to maintain desired speed, then the pitch has to be lowered to add thrust from gravity, which will obviously steepen the line of flight.

      • Don says

        October 14, 2020 at 9:10 am

        This

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines