• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Test flight fatal for pilot

By NTSB · November 23, 2020 ·

The airline transport pilot, who was also an airframe and powerplant mechanic, was conducting a personal flight in a twin-engine Piper PA 30 after troubleshooting an unknown problem with the left engine fuel system.

A family member described the flight as a “test flight.”

Witnesses reported that, after departure, the airplane climbed to about 500 feet above ground level and began a left turn. During the left turn, the airplane “nose dived” in a downward spiral, and the airplane hit terrain near Marion, Indiana.

The pilot died in the crash.

Post-accident examinations revealed no mechanical anomalies with the airframe, right engine, or propellers that would have precluded normal operation.

The left engine propeller blade damage was consistent with low or no power at the time of the accident, and the blades were found in an unfeathered position.

Evidence indicated that the pilot had recently replaced the left and right fuel selector valves and had been performing ground engine runs.

A comprehensive examination of the airplane’s fuel system was not possible due to the extensive fire damage to the system. However, given the unknown left engine fuel system issue, a loose left fuel selector fuel line, and the lack of power signatures on the left propeller blades, it is likely that the fuel system’s performance was degraded and led to a partial or total loss of left engine power.

The airplane’s downward spiral was consistent with the pilot exceeding the airplane’s critical angle of attack during a single-engine operation, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and subsequent loss of control.

Probable cause: The pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack following a loss of the left engine power shortly after takeoff, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall at an altitude too low for recovery. Contributing to the accident was the loss of left engine power due most likely to a fuel system issue that could not be determined based on the available evidence.

NTSB Identification: CEN19FA035

This November 2018 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. William Green says

    November 25, 2020 at 9:05 am

    This one is mind blowing. The guy was presumably a highly skilled pilot with much experience flying the airplane and knew it had a fuel problem yet somehow was caught off-guard by the engine losing power and failed to respond with recovery procedures that every ME pilot receives in their initial training? As with most fatal accidents, it was entirely preventable with a modicum of common sense and practicing ‘what could go wrong’ procedures.

  2. Wylbur Wrong says

    November 24, 2020 at 9:06 am

    Me thinks the probable cause is a probable guess. From the picture shown, if it is indeed where the pilot had turned to cross-wind, one can’t know if the pilot is at or above blue-line.

    If the engine failure was sudden, and the pilot was in a left turn, it is conceivable that the crash would look like a Vmc roll induced crash, or even a stall.

    Think about this, at or below 500 AGL and one is in a left turn when the left engine quits. The startle factor may not have one pull the power to then correct the bank etc.

    In a situation like this, the plane would not have necessarily stalled. But the p-factor, with the left bank (now turning into a dead engine)…

    Those of you with Multi-ratings — you see how this could have come about without a stall?

  3. Jim Macklin. ATP/CFII. says

    November 24, 2020 at 8:08 am

    Typos
    Vmca and Vyse
    Damn autocorret😵

  4. Jim Macklin. ATP/CFII. says

    November 24, 2020 at 8:03 am

    Vaca requires rudder. Vase we needs pitch about 2 or 3 degrees up with straight flight.
    Straight flight will soon require banking slightly toward the good engine with rudder pressure to balance the slip.
    Then clean up by the check list.
    What/ when did this pilot last practice SE procedures?

    • Bill R. says

      November 24, 2020 at 1:13 pm

      Actually, the yaw induced by the slip, which normally must be balanced by opposite rudder, is instead countered by the thrust of the remaining operational engine. In this manner, as stated, the flight path will be straight.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines