• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Improper fuel management leads to fuel starvation and forced landing

By NTSB · January 11, 2021 ·

A pilot was injured and a passenger seriously injured when the Beech A36 plane lost engine power during a practice instrument approach to Fort Worth Meacham International Airport (KFTW) in Texas.

The airline transport certificated pilot made an off-airport forced landing in a field five miles southeast of KFTW. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the forward portion of the fuselage.

The pilot told an FAA inspector that before departing the airport in Angel Fire, N.M., both fuel tanks were 3/4 full. He said he maintained fuel balance by switching between the left and right tanks “several times” during the flight.

As he approached the DFW (Dallas-Fort Worth) TCA (Terminal Control Area), he requested and received vectors for a practice ILS (instrument landing system) Runway 34 approach to KFTW. Following slower traffic, he requested termination of the approach and said he would continue on to KGKY.

Shortly after climbing to 1,500 feet, the engine lost power. The pilot switched the fuel selector “to the other tank” and attempted to restart the engine, but to no avail.

He failed to turn on the electric boost pump (as required in the emergency checklist) and that, because of the airplane’s low altitude, he did not have time to refer to the emergency checklist. He lowered the landing gear, but elected not to lower the flaps for landing. The airplane touched down on soft earth, the nose gear collapsed, and the airplane nosed down.

An FAA inspector inspected the wreckage and sumped clear, bright fuel from the airplane’s left fuel tank that appeared to be free of contaminants. The fuel gauges indicated slightly more than 1/4 full in the left fuel tank, but the right tank was empty.

Visual inspection of the tanks revealed a small, unknown fuel quantity in the left tank and the right fuel tank was empty. The fuel selector was positioned on the left tank.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s improper fuel management, which resulted in fuel starvation and a loss of engine power.

NTSB Identification: 98908

This January 2019 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily. Sign up here.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. scott says

    January 16, 2021 at 5:05 am

    Had an unexpected engine shutdown. Throttle back,, switched tanks, hit the electric auxiliary pump, restart…
    All total about 3 seconds. Maybe that’s the “what to do now?” difference between an ATP and mechanic….😆
    Could also be the difference between my carb and his injection trying to purge.

  2. JimH in CA says

    January 12, 2021 at 9:53 am

    A Beech A36 standard tanks hold 44 gallons of usable fuel, so 3/4 tanks is 33 gallons.
    With a fuel burn of 11.5 to 15 gph , there was 2.8 to 2.2 hours of fuel, so trying to fly for 2.5 hours was very risky.
    The NTSB note of about 1/4 fuel in the left tank is 5.5 gallons, enough for about 25 minutes….and this pilot has a lot of experience is various aircraft, and claims he left out 11 gallons to ‘ensure sufficient climb performance’…FOOL! did 66 lbs make that much difference ? I doubt it.!

    • Wylbur Wrong says

      January 16, 2021 at 5:08 pm

      KAXX is above 6000′ MSL. I don’t have the books for a Beech A36. Runway is listed at 8900′ today with FF (16JAN21). And I didn’t see any specifics on the W/B other than they were w/in limits with pax in front seat. BTW — NTSB info lists this plane as belonging to the pilot.

      So, I wonder if that 66lbs would have put him out of limits.

  3. george gould says

    January 12, 2021 at 8:42 am

    This kind of preflight planning mistake causes our aircraft insurance costs to increase every time this happens.

  4. gbigs says

    January 12, 2021 at 6:50 am

    A lot of mistakes for an alleged ATP to make…

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines