• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pilot hits drainage culvert

By NTSB · January 19, 2021 ·

The pilot reported that during an approach into the sun, he believed that his approach angle was too high, and he decided to abort the landing to the airport in Williamsburg, Virginia.

But when he increased the throttle, the engine sputtered, so he decided to continue the landing.

Once on the runway he quickly applied the Piper PA28’s brakes.

The right brake locked up, the airplane left the right side of the runway, and hit a drainage culvert.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing.

The pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s excessive brake application during the landing roll, which resulted in a runway excursion and collision with a drainage culvert.

NTSB Identification: 98955

This January 2019 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. CJ says

    January 20, 2021 at 6:48 pm

    Yes, Wilbur Wrong the FAA accident inspector should know what kind of brakes the plane has as equipment. More modern PA28 have toe brakes but the old dogs have the Johnson bar as the Comanche and the Tri Pacer -Pacer series. I never liked them as I considered it a cheap way out of certification.

    • Wylbur Wrong says

      January 21, 2021 at 7:18 pm

      In transitioning from Cessnas to a P28A-180C I came to like the hand brake as, unlike the Cessna 15x and 172s, the Piper has positive steering with the nose wheel and not bungee cord type connections to the nose wheel where one has to stand on the brakes to get the sucker to turn if not moving at 5MPH or faster.

      There was an STC to put toe brakes in, but the hand brake worked just fine for that plane. So, I wondered if there had been such an STC for the smaller P28As.

  2. Warren Webb Jr says

    January 20, 2021 at 9:59 am

    The pilot made a telling comment in the pilot’s report – “engine regained full power, however, due to high angle of attack, plane continued to sink”. That appears to indicate another instance of faulty pitch control when executing a go-around, a significant issue as has been mentioned consistently in safety articles.

  3. Wylbur Wrong says

    January 20, 2021 at 4:33 am

    Toe brakes or hand brake only? That is the question. If hand brake, then there is a problem as both brakes should have been applied equally. Inspector should have known about this for the PA281400 (How about PA28-140?).

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines