• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pietenpol test flight goes awry

By NTSB · July 6, 2021 ·

The pilot in the experimental amateur-built Pietenpol reported that this was the first test flight after the airplane had been reassembled following purchase and transport. He performed two high-speed taxi runs, then he back taxied and subsequently took off from the airport in Anacortes, Washington.

During the landing roll, “the left front landing gear attachment lugs broke off the mount fitting,” according to the pilot.

He lost directional control of the airplane and ground-looped to the right. The airplane entered a ditch and nosed over.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing aft lift strut.

Probable Cause: The failure of the left main landing gear attachment point during the landing roll for reasons that could not be determined because the attachment was not examined, which resulted in a loss of directional control, collision with a drainage culvert, and a subsequent nose-over.

NTSB Identification: 99802

This July 2019 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. José Serra says

    July 7, 2021 at 11:58 am

    I do agree with Jim Sturges, Sr..

  2. Jim Sturges, Sr says

    July 7, 2021 at 4:58 am

    The question begged is, “why was not the attachment not examined?”

    If this article is supposed to be a learning opportunity, both the begged question needs to be answered and analysis of other similar aircraft ought to be performed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines