• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Distracted pilot leads to a hard landing and post-accident fire

By NTSB · September 22, 2021 ·

The pilot reported that, during approach to the airport in Elizabethtown, N.C., he noticed the Cessna 182 was high, so he reduced power and lowered the nose.

While correcting, he was talking to his passenger and became distracted.

He realized he was not in a good landing attitude, so he added power and pulled back on the yoke. The airplane landed hard, which collapsed the nose landing gear and ruptured the fuel system. The airplane veered left and exited the runway onto the adjacent grass.

The pilot and passengers were able to get out of the airplane, which was destroyed in a post-accident fire.

The pilot reported that there were no pre-accident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The pilot added as a safety recommendation that maintaining a sterile cockpit must always be a priority during landing.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s improper landing flare, which resulted in a hard landing and postaccident fire. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s distraction during short final.

NTSB Identification: 100487

This September 2019 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Doug Brownlee says

    October 27, 2021 at 8:05 am

    INATTENTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. RC says

    September 25, 2021 at 9:55 am

    I’m no expert, but 43 years of flying, instructing and evaluation has taught me this:
    Store it away in your memory bank, learn from it.
    Criticize it publicly at your peril. Karma is a biotch.

  3. CJ says

    September 25, 2021 at 9:09 am

    C182’s are nose heavy and like the 206 will wheelbarrow upon landing. This pilot never learned how to make approaches and by guessing was about two miles behind the aircraft in his thinking. A bounce will usually cost a firewall, too. Cessna keeps many in stock.

  4. Bill+Schwartz says

    September 25, 2021 at 8:35 am

    Why would you want to publish the pilot’s ID and encourage a request to lift his license.
    Serious as it is mistakes will be made including all of us. Haven’t me a perfect pilot, nor a perfect person in all of my, flying or otherwise in allof my 97 years.

  5. Anon says

    September 25, 2021 at 4:34 am

    SOUNDS like he got a big sink rate going, tried to save the landind vs go-around.

  6. Tom Curran says

    September 23, 2021 at 10:37 am

    “While correcting, he was talking to his passenger and became distracted.”

    Interesting discussion in the Narrative section of the accident report: Says he was talking about what/why he was doing-while he was doing it (as opposed to say, discussing a football game or where they were going to eat lunch). How do you get distracted from what you are doing, by talking about what you are doing, while you are doing it….?

    Glad no one was hurt!

  7. Tom Curran says

    September 23, 2021 at 10:23 am

    “While correcting, he was talking to his passenger and became distracted.”

    Interesting discussion in the Narrative section of the accident report: Says he was talking about what/why he was doing-what he was doing (as opposed to say, discussing a football game or where they were going to eat lunch). How do you get distracted from what you are doing, by talking about what you are doing, while you are doing it….?

    Glad no one was hurt!

  8. Jim+Macklin.+ATP/CFII. says

    September 23, 2021 at 9:11 am

    Missing
    Stabilized approach
    Sterile cockpit
    No perceived glide path
    No go-around

    Pilots must “see the invisible” glide path.

  9. Bartr says

    September 23, 2021 at 8:06 am

    Noticed he was high so “reduced power and lowed the nose”. This guy is in serious need of some remedial training!

    “If you want to go down, raise the nose. If you want to go down faster, raise it some more.”

    Words of wisdom from a multi thousand hour flight instructor. The worst thing we do with a prospective pilot is to tell them that pulling back raises the nose and makes the airplane go up, pushing makes it go down. When we push the nose down the airplane instantly responds by trying to raise it back to the trimmed airspeed, pay attention to what the airplane is trying to tell you.

    • Tom Curran says

      September 23, 2021 at 10:05 am

      You’re assuming it was trimmed to an “appropriate” airspeed in the first place.

      • Bartr says

        September 25, 2021 at 7:10 am

        If it wasn’t trimmed “to an appropriate airspeed” see the recommendation for remedial training.

    • Anon says

      September 25, 2021 at 4:40 am

      SOUNDS like he got a big sink rate going, tried to save the landing, vs go-around. I could be wrong. Pushing the nose over can definitely make the aircraft go down, vice-versa. Depends on your speed—if you’re going 400 knots in an F-16, or T-38, pull is up, but on final in Cessna 172, might stall by pulling. In a Lancair IV, guys kill themselves (sometimes) bygetting into a big sink rate on final, getting near the ground, seeing the “ground rush,” snatching the stick back, instant stall, huge wing drop. Oh, then crash, that happens right after the wing drop.

      • Bartr says

        September 25, 2021 at 7:09 am

        We’re talking about a landing here, right? Push the nose down at 400 knots in a trimmed condition the airplane, any airplane, will try to return to trimmed airspeed, right? What’s your point?

  10. Jimmy says

    September 23, 2021 at 6:17 am

    Dear FAA:
    Please revoke the certificates held by this pilot today.
    Zero talent for aviating.

    • Michael+Schulz says

      September 24, 2021 at 5:53 am

      Well put.

    • scott says

      September 25, 2021 at 9:47 am

      Across the board?….Every gear up, fuel exhaustion, VFR into IMC, runway incursion, ground loop?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines