• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Bent push rod leads to partial loss of power

By NASA · January 9, 2024 ·

This is an excerpt from a report made to the Aviation Safety Reporting System. The narrative is written by the pilot, rather than FAA or NTSB officials. To maintain anonymity, many details, such as aircraft model or airport, are often scrubbed from the reports.

This event occurred in a Cessna 172 during a lesson with a student.

After rolling wings level from a clearing turn, engine RPM dropped to 1,000. After five seconds the RPM increased to 2,000. The RPM kept cycling in this manner with no change from throttle, mixture or pitch.

I believed a complete engine failure was possible, so I took command of the aircraft from the student, and started flying back to ZZZ since it was the closest airfield.

I pulled the carb heat on, verified the RPM was full and mixture rich, primer locked, master on, fuel on both.

I contacted Approach and requested priority handling to ensure I would receive priority handling and services if an off-field landing would be required. I was able to make it back to the field and performed a straight-in landing for Runway XX.

I contacted ZZZ after safely landing and ensured I no longer required assistance.

The cause of the partial engine failure was a bent push rod.

No pre-flight action nor run up would have caught this condition. It was a good reaction to make an immediate return to the field.

Primary Problem: Ambiguous

ACN: 2011294

About NASA

NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily. Sign up here.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Derrick says

    January 10, 2024 at 2:18 pm

    GA water detection systems were available via STC in past years. I removed one from a Piper Commanche a few years ago. The fuel sump bowl had been drilled and a probe installed that would activate a warning light in the cockpit. I don’t remember who manufactured it.

    Pushrods bend for various reasons- intermittent sticking/bent valve, improper valve train assembly after maintenance, improper pushrod length due to no/improper bled down rocker clearance measurements after cylinder change(s), engine overspeed. Take your pick….it was error on the part of someone.

  2. Mike DeHart says

    January 10, 2024 at 8:05 am

    Run to lean doesn’t pay in the long run

    • JimH in CA says

      January 10, 2024 at 12:36 pm

      That has nothing to do with lead salts depositing on the exhaust valve stem from burning 100LL.

  3. Mark says

    January 10, 2024 at 6:20 am

    Had this occur at the flight school I’m at on a 172N w. 180 hp upgrade. Think there may have another one in the last year too.

  4. Henry Cooper says

    January 10, 2024 at 6:06 am

    Wonder if this engine was an O-320-E2D? It’s been almost 50 years since 80/87 gas was phased out, but when that hsppened, it wasn’t long before we experienced bent pushrods in our 172 fleet.

    • Philip Nash says

      January 10, 2024 at 7:07 pm

      320s bad for bent push rods. Changed many in brantly helicopters. Solved problem mixing marvel mystery oil in fuel.

  5. Robert E. Scovill, Jr. says

    January 9, 2024 at 10:24 am

    Cessna aircraft have a flaw in their fuel tanks that do not offer the positive detection of water in the fuel tanks during the pilots preflight.

    https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/pilots-say-being-blamed-plane-crashes-that-arent-their-fault/VGNXKERZANHBDI4JO2H324VVEQ/

    • JimH in CA says

      January 9, 2024 at 4:43 pm

      I don’t know of any GA aircraft that has a water detection system.
      Older Cessnas have 1 quick drain valve in each tank, while later 172R models have 5 valves in each tank, supposedly to allow water to be removed from ‘trap’ areas.

      While a bent pushrod is usually caused by a stuck valve. A bend pushrod can also damage the push rod tube, allowing oil to be dumped overboard.
      Lycoming has issued a service bulletin on checking for sticking exhaust valves at 400 hour intervals. SB-388C.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines