• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

A hazardous attitude of invulnerability

By NASA · June 18, 2024 ·

This is an excerpt from a report made to the Aviation Safety Reporting System. The narrative is written by the pilot, rather than FAA or NTSB officials. To maintain anonymity, many details, such as aircraft model or airport, are often scrubbed from the reports.

I was flying with my student pilot in the morning. It was a clear day and I was excited to fly.

We completed the preflight on the DA40 Diamond Star and everything looked good.

I let my student taxi us to the run-up area on the ramp. This was his second time doing it (this was only our fourth flight).

The run-up area was getting closer and I told my student to add 18 MP and step hard on the right brake to turn us into a west heading. However, my student added too much power and did not step on the right brake hard enough. The turn was aggressive/abrupt. It happened so fast and a big thud sound happened.

At that point I took flight controls and stopped the aircraft. My first thought was that we damaged the nosewheel or popped the tire. I also thought we might have hit the yellow poles that are located on the edge of the pavement.

My thought process was first check the nosewheel. So I added power and advanced forward to see if it seemed stable. It was.

Then I kept replaying the event in my head to see if we could have been too close to hit the left wingtip on the yellow poles.

My student asked me if we should go look at it. However, I told myself that there was no way we hit the wingtip because I gave my student enough distance. My thought process was I’ve been to the run-up area before and I know the distance to turn.

This turned into a hazardous attitude of invulnerability. I talked myself out of believing that we could have hit our wingtip.

I thought it was the nosewheel and since I checked it and it was good I proceeded with the flight.

I decided not to shut down the engine and look at the wingtip.

After our flight, we parked on the ramp in our designated parking spot. My student was putting on the tie-down for the left wing when he told me that there was damage and we did hit the yellow poles during our set up for ground check at the run-up.

Looking back at this event, it could have been prevented by shutting down the engine and checking the wingtip before we flew. This would have been the safest choice.

Telling myself it couldn’t have been the wingtip and not looking at the big picture and checking was a contributing factor.

I also think being a new flight instructor had an effect on my actions to this. My inexperience to make my own decision and not stopping and thinking that looking at the problem was a pressure.

Learning from this event, I know going forward that when you talk yourself out of a reality and takeaway the thoughts of “I have done this before and the distance to turn was enough” that is not an answer and checking the aircraft and shutting down the engine is the best action.

Primary Problem: Human Factors

ACN: 2084040

About NASA

NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Tom Curran says

    June 19, 2024 at 9:03 am

    I think the self-analysis and resulting ‘mea culpas’ are a pretty good indication that neither the 240-hour CFI, nor the student pilot, will ever do that again.

    It also demonstrates that the concept of “See and Avoid” doesn’t apply only while in-flight, and is not just between one aircraft and another.

  2. Eric Taylor says

    June 19, 2024 at 8:11 am

    Without having seen the situation first-hand, my first thought was why were there “yellow poles” so close to the run-up area, where aircraft are by design going to maneuvering around tightly?
    A few years ago, a pair of noise abatement signs were placed right at the edge of the pavement of the run-up areas at my airport. IMHO it was only a matter of time before someone hit them with a wing, so I made a fuss with the airport manager until the signs were relocated farther away from the pavement edge.
    Maybe these yellow poles need the same sort of relocation.

  3. James Brian Potter says

    June 19, 2024 at 7:02 am

    Another instance of get-there-itis. He was excited to get into the air and over-rode his gut telling him to get out and look for damage. Could have been a fuel leak or worse. Safety first. Pleasurable recreation last. Cheat the Grim Reaper as often as you can.
    /J

  4. Scott Patterson says

    June 19, 2024 at 4:39 am

    Sounds like an AI instructor. Being certified and being competent are two very different things.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines