• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Controller, student pilot contribute to near miss

By General Aviation News Staff · May 13, 2025 · 1 Comment

This is an excerpt from a report made to the Aviation Safety Reporting System. The narrative is written by the pilot, rather than FAA or NTSB officials. To maintain anonymity, many details, such as aircraft model or airport, are often scrubbed from the reports.

Upon departure from Runway 30R at Rocky Mountain Metro Airport (KBJC) in Denver, I, along with a CFI, were cleared to turn northbound 2-3 miles off the departure end of the runway.

At about 1 mile off the departure end of the runway, Tower cleared us for a northbound (right) turn. When we turned northbound, a light aircraft in our blind spot was less than 200 feet off the nose of our aircraft. I steepened the right hand turn and the light aircraft also took evasive action turning hard right.

After listening to ATC audio on the ground, the light aircraft was cleared for a midfield right downwind to 30R. Instead, he was flying through the departure leg at about 6,300 feet MSL. This was unnoticed by ATC until after the near collision occurred.

The light aircraft was being flown by a student solo pilot. After the near miss, the light aircraft pilot said he became “disoriented” looking for traffic.

ATC asked if he had the airport in sight, because after the incident the light aircraft was now flying away from the airport on the departure leg. I do not think the Tower Controller ever realized the mistake nor was the light aircraft pilot instructed to call the Tower. I believe Tower may have been “behind the plane.”

It seems they assumed the inbound light aircraft was adhering to their clearance without verifying it.

I believe the student solo pilot either thought he was landing on 12L (the reciprocal runway), or believed he was cleared for a downwind for 30L and was attempting to fly a crosswind for this runway. The light aircraft pilot did eventually land on 30L.

Primary Problem: Human Factors

ACN: 2190661

When you click on the link it will take you to the ASRS Online Database. Click on Report Number and put the ACN in the search box, then click Search. On that page, click on “view only the 1 most recent report.”

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. James B. Potter says

    May 14, 2025 at 6:23 am

    The ubiquitous system of air traffic controllers and pilots came into existence many decades ago and functioned reasonably well for decades when the traffic volume density was much lower than today’s. It appears today’s traffic density has saturated the system which demands precision critical attention among planes and controllers which in turn stretches the limits of human capabilities. It’s herding cats. People can only keep track of so much information until the brain sheds data in self-defense. Newark airport is a good case study in this regard. Too many airplanes, too high workload on too few controllers. The headlight of an oncoming train.

    Decades from now, future aviation generations will read our current history and shake their heads in disbelief about our Conestoga wagon day system that we attempted to mitigate air disasters with mainly human surveillance of the beehive in the air. Perhaps integrating AI into the aircraft management function to relieve human controllers of much of the detail so they can direct their attention to higher priority tasks might improve safety and efficiency. That, coupled with air law enforcement to punish the cowboys who disregard controller directions. Something has got to give.
    Regards/J

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines