• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

FAA reauthorization bill stumbles again

By Janice Wood · July 18, 2011 ·

WASHINGTON, DC – Even though the U.S. House of Representatives cancelled its scheduled recess this week, it is evident that the long-stalled FAA reauthorization bill will not be completed by the expiration of the 20th short-term extension on July 22. On July 15, House Transportation and Infrastructure chairman John Mica (R-Fla.) and House Ways and Means chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) introduced H.R. 2553, a record-busting 21st extension that would run until Sept. 16, 2011. This is not good news for the industry as a whole, but certainly not for general aviation airports, say officials with the General Aviation Airport Coalition (GAAC).

On May 25, however, the coalition initiated an advocacy campaign urging House and Senate leaders to join forces and deliver a complete reauthorization bill to provide the greatest user benefits possible to general aviation airports.

GA airports, struggling to remain operational in a much-troubled economic climate, have experienced sharp decreases in local fiscal support. Many struggle to simply raise the 5% local matching funds required to take part in the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program (AIP) program. And now, just when money is the tightest in decades, the House voted to increase the local cost share to 10%, making GA airport participation in AIP programs even less likely, coalition officials said. GAAC supports the Senate-passed language to maintain the current AIP 95/5 cost-share, as well as the $8.1 billion in AIP funding included in Senate-passed bill (S. 223).

The FAA’s view of Through-the-Fence (TTF) agreements – currently under agency review – represents another significant hurdle to GA airports. GAAC believes a general aviation airport should not be held in violation of federal grant assurances – FAA’s proposal – solely due to a pre-existing TTF agreement. To GAAC, inclusion of Section 137 of the House-passed language is essential to guarantee that airports with existing TTF agreements do not lose AIP funds to which they would normally be entitled, officials noted.

Finally, given GA airports’ unique role in the aviation industry, GAAC believes it is imperative that GA airports and the coalition be more closely involved in the development of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). GAAC supports language in the House- and Senate-passed reauthorization bills that requires GA participation in development of the NextGen plan. GAAC is positioning itself to play a role in this process.

Above all, GAAC believes, unlike the Senate, that any new reauthorization legislation should last at least four years.

The General Aviation Airport Coalition preserves and promotes general aviation airports across the United States, with a unifying voice to support appropriate legislation and policies. GAAC also helps airports clearly communicate their economic value to all constituents, and provides a forum for GA airport stakeholders to share best practices and materials to help in the day-to-day operations and management of GA airports. For more information: GAAirportCoalition.org

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become a better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Ben Sclair says

    July 19, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    Walter,

    “Most of the FAA rule make is ridiculous and would never fly in private business.” At the risk of putting you on the spot, will you cite some specific examples? I’d love to use General Aviation News as mouthpiece for ridding the FARs of unnecessary rules and regulations, but we’ll need specifics.

  2. Walter Hake says

    July 19, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    The FAA budget needs a review. General aviation is being priced beyond the budget of small plane owners. The FAAs spending policy is a major factor and should be stopped. Most of the FAAs rule making is rediculus and would never fly in private business.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines