• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Does flight school’s 172 need new rings?

By Paul McBride · August 14, 2013 ·

This question was initially sent to our fuels and oil expert Ben Visser, who passed it on to our engines expert Paul McBride for further comment.

Q: Our flight school has a Cessna 172N with an O-320 H2AD. The engine was rebuilt 120 hours ago after cam/lifter failure. The engine uses one half quart of Aeroshell 100 Plus every hour! Oil analysis iron ppm is very low. Compression was 75-78 at 100 hour. Do you think that the rings did not seat? Do I pull the cylinders for new rings and hone?

Denney Marsh, Hemet-Ryan Flight School 

A: From Benton Visser: A few questions: How much oil do you put in it? The O-320 has a six-quart sump and if you put six quarts in it, it will blow out this much oil.

Also what kind of cylinders did you put on it? Who rebuilt it and what do they say? I would try running it at four to five quarts and run it hard (at least 75% power) for about 50 hours or so. If it does not change, you will probably need to pull the cylinders.

A: From Paul McBride: The O-320-H series only has a six-quart oil sump capacity and unlike other 320s, you need to keep the quantity close to that, which you’ll understand after reading the next sentence. Being connected to the highest efficient oil pump keeps lots of oil in circulation. The “H” never had a blowing overboard problem like the conventional 320, 360, and 540 series Lycomings when the full sump capacity was put in — you know, the old “blow the first quart out the breather” routine.

I’m leaning more to the lack of ring seating on this one, however it is still within the maximum allowable oil consumption for this engine, which is .72 quarts per hour, but this is at 2,700 rpm, which I doubt you are using.

Even at 2,450 rpm or 75%, you are limited to a maximum usage of .40 quarts per hour. The problem here, as you know, is it probably won’t get any better.

You may try to follow Ben’s recommendation of flying it hard for 50 hours (very difficult to do in a flight school) to see if you can bring the cylinders in. Failing that, as Ben mentioned, you are probably going to have to pull the cylinders, hone them, and install new rings and start over.

If the school is large enough where you can dictate this aircraft only be flown on long cross-countries where you can keep the power up, you might be able to get the rings seated, but it’s a question mark at this point.

About Paul McBride

Paul McBride, an expert on engines, retired after almost 40 years with Lycoming.

Send your questions to [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Paul Brevard says

    September 1, 2013 at 9:00 am

    As a side bar to this conversation, you might consider the breather baffle, P/N: LW-15379. This baffle fits inside the crankcase adjacent to the breather port on the back of the engine. If this baffle were inadvertently left out of assembly, the engine will blow oil out of the breather regardless of cylinder condition.

  2. Albert Beckwith says

    August 17, 2013 at 4:07 pm

    I go along with McBride Comments.
    Al Beckwith

  3. Mack says

    August 16, 2013 at 10:25 am

    km has it right!

    But then, those on a high-horse can’t see that part of the engine, the area that has the oil recovery tubes.

    My O-540 is missing the “oil slinger” “that blows out the first quart”. I can’t find the part in any of the catalogs!

    12 quarts in, and after an hour’s flight-time, still 12 quarts in there!

  4. km says

    August 15, 2013 at 5:33 am

    Any evidence of external leak, top ocow or lower cowl, might want to check,the oil recovery tubes and clamps

    ken

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines