• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

STC in the works for G100UL

By Janice Wood · September 11, 2014 ·

While the government begins its testing of four potential 100LL replacements, George Braly and Tim Roehl of General Aviation Modifications Inc. in Oklahoma just finished up yet another test of their unleaded 100-octane avgas — G100UL — at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

The fuel underwent flight testing and engine block testing in one of the school’s carbureted 172s.

“No issues were found,” Roehl reports. “We just lack a couple of other tests to complete our first STC on the 172.”

Four years and millions of dollars into development of G100UL, Braly and Roehl chose not to submit the fuel as a potential candidate for the PAFI testing, noting they were “already far down the road to completing the STC.”

Once the first STC is received — Roehl hopes it will be in the next year — it will be followed by a growing list of engines and airframes approved for the unleaded fuel.

Roehl explained it is a two-step process, technically called Approved Model List Supplemental Type Certificate (AML-STC). The first step is a list of approved engines, while the second is a list of approved airframes. “If your engine and your airframe are on the list, you can use the fuel,” he explains.

The fuel will be a true drop-in replacement for 100LL, according to GAMI officials.

That means the only change to your airplane may be a placard or a supplement to the flight manual, according to Roehl.

“There will be no operational changes needed,” he says. “There is no limitation in mixing the fuel with 100LL in any percentage. This will hold true across all engines and airframes.”

GAMI doesn’t plan to go into the fuel production business, but instead plans to license the formulation to producers. According to Roehl, there already has been interest in producing the fuel, with all parties just awaiting STC approval.

Unlike some of the other alternatives to 100LL, GAMI officials believe pilots and aircraft owners will find a “high comfort level” with G100UL.

“It’s very similar to 100LL,” Roehl says, noting it is “petroleum based.”

However, GAMI officials won’t divulge exactly what’s in the fuel, calling it a secret formula akin to the secret formula for Coca-Cola.

“There is nothing in it that hasn’t been running in airplanes in the past,” Braly says.

“And the FAA has been exceedingly thorough in testing it,” Roehl continues, noting that many of the tests this fuel has already been through is what the PAFI fuels are now facing.

“The fuel works great and we don’t expect any issues with it,” he says.

So when can you expect to buy G100UL? That’s unknown until the STC is approved.

“It all starts with approval,” Roehl says. “Once we get approval, things should move faster.”

For more information: GAMI.com

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become a better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. David Gaeddert says

    September 15, 2014 at 2:11 pm

    I wish GAMI well. Where I have to be a little suspicious–proprietary formula. People have been cooking petroleum avgas for over a century, how are they all of a sudden 100 octane with no alcohol or tetra ethyl lead? I am totally suspicious of Shell and Total, who are in the official running. Swift Fuel, uspto.gov, Patent #8,556,999, have detailed what they are selling. If, great big if, one of these guys actually markets a true 100UL at any reasonable price, that will be huge not just for GA. Is that maybe why there is so much politics and delay?

  2. Greg W says

    September 14, 2014 at 7:24 am

    A fuel that requires a STC will likely face the same problems as the STC fuel that has been available since 1982. Unleaded autogas has been STC’d and is rarely available at airports. It is okay, fine, with the FAA but not with insurance companies and local airport authorities and their attorneys. I wish them well, but, I think they should have submitted the fuel to the feds. to attempt “blanket” approval with out a STC, like 100LL has. Check your type cert. for what you fly most are not approved for 100LL, it is “acceptable to the FAA it was not tested by the aircraft manufacturer.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines