• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Wrong wheels contribute to Parrakeet accident

By NTSB · September 9, 2015 ·

The pilot stated that, during the landing roll, the left main landing gear wheel fractured on the Parrakeet. The experimental-homebuilt airplane subsequently veered off the runway in Castroville, Texas, and flipped over.

Post-accident examination of the fractured left main wheel revealed that the wheel failed due to overstress of the cast aluminum alloy. No evidence of preexisting cracks was observed.

According to the pilot, the wheel had accrued only 11.4 hours since he had installed it, and it had about 15 cycles (landings) at the time of the accident.

The wheels installed on the airplane were designed for ultralight aircraft that have an empty weight of less than 254 pounds. The Parrakeet weighed about 954 pounds and would have required wheels with a higher loading capability.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the failure of the left main landing gear wheel on landing due to overstress, which resulted in the pilot’s loss of directional control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s improper decision to install wheels with insufficient loading capacity for the airplane.

NTSB Identification: CEN13LA534

This August 2013 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Paul says

    September 10, 2015 at 7:08 pm

    This pilot was gambling that the wheels would continue to withstand the overloaded condition without failing. Predictably he lost the gamble. Why would anyone gamble with such a dangerous configuration? Stupid is as stupid does!

  2. John says

    September 10, 2015 at 10:54 am

    I guess the tiny, insufficient wheels is a tangible reason for why the plane was called “experimental”. I personally am not comfortable flying in a home built plane. While it’s great that people can build their own aircraft, this and other builder issues demonstrate there’s no free lunch. The freedom to “experiment” comes with a greater potential for mechanical failures. I’m glad the builder wasn’t seriously injured.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines