• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Mechanical issue brings down RV-9A

By NTSB · February 9, 2016 ·

The pilot reported that, during the approach to landing, the RV-9A’s propeller stopped spinning, but that the engine continued functioning normally. He subsequently made a forced landing to a field near Apopka, Fla.

During the landing, the plane flipped over and came to rest inverted, which resulted in substantial damage to the wings and vertical stabilizer, as well as one serious injury and one minor injury.

Post-accident examination of the engine revealed that the spline shaft had uncoupled from the drive disk adapter. The splines of the spline shaft, the drive disk adapter, and the propeller speed reduction unit (PSRU) input spline exhibited signs of severe wear consistent with fretting corrosion.

Research revealed that several spline shaft failures had occurred on other airplanes. Some of the failures resulted in a loss of engine power and subsequent forced landings, while some of the failures were identified during inspection.

The manufacturer issued guidance to users to apply a nickel or copper antiseize compound on the spline shaft during installation of the PSRU to decrease wear, however, the manufacturer did not provide users with any instructions or recommendations to routinely inspect and lubricate the spline components.

The pilot/builder reported that the PSRU and spline shaft had not been removed, lubricated, or inspected since it had been installed about 325 hours before the accident.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the failure of the propeller spline shaft, the drive disk adapter, and the PSRU input spline due to a lack of inspection and lubrication, which resulted in a total loss of propeller drive and a subsequent forced landing. Contributing to the accident was the lack of manufacturer guidance for inspecting and lubricating the PSRU gearbox spline components.

NTSB Identification: ERA14LA130

This February 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Rajon says

    February 11, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    The engine is a Subaru and not the issue. The PSRU produced by the defunct company called Egenfellner has caused a few RV’s to dead stick over the years. The same guy who “engineered” these PSRU is supposedly now selling Honda engines under the name of “Viking” for RV-12s…let the buyer beware.

  2. John says

    February 10, 2016 at 8:17 am

    It was a Subaru engine. See: http://dms.ntsb.gov/public/56500-56999/56535/558731.pdf

    According to a representative for the company that built mods for that engine the aircraft was equipped with an outdated and not recommended flywheel. It also had a prop that had undesirable harmonics with the engine.

    I guess when we mess with engines and props the true meaning of “experimental” is sometimes demonstrated. 😉

  3. Tom Strong says

    February 10, 2016 at 7:18 am

    I read this report with much interest since I own an RV 9A. Then I saw “spline shaft and drive disk adapter and PSRU” and decided this accident must have happened on a different planet or else my plane with 1500 hrs is in deep trouble since it doesn’t have any of these items. Please, less esoteric articles and more details.

  4. Skip Kramer says

    February 10, 2016 at 6:18 am

    NTSB report contains all pertinent data. Click on the RED highlighted report number for the synopsis page.

    At the right lower section, past the synopsis section, find the link to the full report. The actual NTSB report contains all pertinent pilot, aircraft and engine data.

    Hope this helps.

  5. JS says

    February 10, 2016 at 6:08 am

    Completely useless report without identifying the engine and PRSU in use.

  6. Dan says

    February 10, 2016 at 5:34 am

    Which engine? 912 rotax?

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines