• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Is this converted engine reliable?

By Paul McBride · May 12, 2016 ·

Q: We recently bored a Lycoming 290-D2 engine to accept 320 cylinders (low compression) with 8.5:1 pistons. The engine has all new bearings and valves, and everything has been magnafluxed, balanced, etc. We retained a very good 290 D2 crankshaft.

From experience, would you say it could make a reliable engine?

Gilles St Pierre, AVIATION BSL (Canada)

A: Gilles, I’m probably not going to win any friends with my response, but my main concern here is safety, which should be the top priority of all of us in this business.

Honestly, I have never before heard of anyone making an engine conversion as you described.

Being retired and not having access to all of the technical information that would be required to research a project like this, I’m going to have to decline to answer.

My personal opinion, just off the top of my head, is that it sounds like you are “trying to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.”

Please don’t misunderstand me, it may be a doable project, but like I said, I’ve never heard of it being done and just thinking about it leaves me a little bit nervous.

The thing that causes me the most concern is how you take a cylinder with a 4-inch, 7/8-inch bore and bore it out to a 5-inch and 1/8-inch bore…and that’s only the beginning of several complicated questions that come to mind.

Please accept my apologies for backing away from this one, but it’s just way out of my league.

About Paul McBride

Paul McBride, an expert on engines, retired after almost 40 years with Lycoming.

Send your questions to [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bob Hartmaier says

    May 13, 2016 at 10:34 am

    My mistake…I read “D-2” and.my mind heard “G”! Happens a lot in my old age. Go to T-18 forums and search John Thorp articles from T-18 newsletters for lots of good info. I believe boring the case is exactly what Lycoming did as they increased the displacement. Google luck!!!

  2. Bob Hartmaier says

    May 13, 2016 at 10:25 am

    I believe he meant that That the ase was bored to accept the cylinders. John Thorp used to “hot rod” the G engine to over 200 hp. I believe the prop flange was a weak point, and he recommended a reenforcing plate be added to the back. Consult Eklund Engineering for a drawing. Otherwise, G parts are identical to certified parts.

  3. Joe Gutierrez says

    May 13, 2016 at 10:11 am

    It sounds what they did was bore the case halves to except the cylinders, in order to bolt on the 0320 cylinders to the case halves.

  4. Richard says

    May 13, 2016 at 6:31 am

    He didn’t say he bored the cylinders. He bored the engine(whatever that means). He said he used 0-320 cylinders.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines