• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Builder’s improper calculations leaves plane uncontrollable

By NTSB · August 16, 2016 ·

According to the pilot/owner/builder of the Minicoupe, he conducted taxi tests, and then a final engine run-up and flight control check prior to takeoff on the airplane’s second flight near Baltimore.

After rotation, the plane reached approximately 3 feet above the runway when the nose dropped, and application of full up elevator had no effect. The airplane hit the runway nose first, which resulted in substantial damage to the firewall.

This was the identical outcome as the first flight several months prior.

An FAA inspector estimated that the builder had added about 63 pounds with his modifications to the original airplane plans.

The pilot performed the weight and balance on the airplane using bathroom scales and stated that there were no mechanical deficiencies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane.

His NTSB Form 6120.1 Operator/Owner Safety Recommendation was: “Re-weigh aircraft with calibrated scales to determine weight and balance. Fix apparent nose heavy aircraft with appropriate movement of the battery or additional weight in the tail section.”

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilot/owner/builder’s improper weight and balance calculations, which rendered the airplane uncontrollable in the pitch axis.

NTSB Identification: ERA14CA408

This August 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Nick charles Sr says

    August 18, 2016 at 3:48 pm

    Now that I’ve had a look on a mini coupe airplane flying on utube I suspect my first post to be right. I hope the builder is reading this? Some sage advice. Don’t
    Build a plane heavier than the designer designed because you think it’ s better.
    Books have been written on this subject alone. But now that you have put it on a diet. Get rid of as much weight as you can. Now get a lot of practice with stalls with an instructor in a 150. Do a weight and balance for everything get it wright your life depends on it. Calculate the new stall speed at your take off weight add 15-20 mph to that for take off. Preflight it like your life depends on it. Don’t forget the gas.
    Fly

  2. BJS says

    August 17, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Another good reason why amateurs building airplanes should limit them to models.

  3. Russell Kuespert says

    August 17, 2016 at 10:07 am

    Wiley Post made just such a fatal mistake with the nose heavy pontoons that were installed on his hybrid aircraft that when nose down into the bay when power was lost on take off taking both his and Will Rogers life.

  4. DALE ROGERS says

    August 17, 2016 at 8:41 am

    Maybe the elevator is not large enough, or in the best location to give positive control!

  5. Paul says

    August 17, 2016 at 7:55 am

    “This was the identical outcome as the first flight several months prior.”

    And what if anything did he learn from that first flight? High speed taxi tests should have indicated a problem had the speed, amount of elevator deflection required and runway distance needed to raise the nose been noted and compared to known data.

  6. Nick Charles Sr says

    August 17, 2016 at 7:43 am

    maybe he just stalled the airplane 3 feet off the ground leaving no time for recovery. If you have the courage to fly the airplane next time keep the speed up and go for 3000feet then pull back. I recommend some lessons and time flying a tested airplane to get rid of the yellow streak you have now. work on stalls.
    use bricks to balance the airplane they work fine evertime no error.

  7. John says

    August 17, 2016 at 6:54 am

    FWIW I’ve seen the ‘bathroom scale trick’ used in years past by some small (read than one guy) A&P shops. That, and other corner cutting have kept me from taking my aircraft to those “maintainers”. This builder probably saw the same bad practice used by a “professional”. It’s another reason why owner assisted annuals (where the owner is watching with a critical eye) are a good idea.

    • Jim says

      August 17, 2016 at 9:26 am

      John, I agree that there are some shady maintenance facilities out there, but not all one man shops are bad. I strive for excellence in every aspect of aviation maintenance and I have certified scales too! I know of some facilities that have several employees with a high overhead that turn out some pretty crappy work! A friend just used one of those shops for a tire change on a C182, they installed the inner brake lining backwards so it ruined the brake disk.

  8. Hans says

    August 17, 2016 at 6:31 am

    I’d like to know how much the aircraft would have weighed without the 63 additional Lbs. If it was around 1100 Lbs then the additional 63 Lbs would have added approx 6% and if it was forward of CG which is what is suggested then that would be dangerous.
    My bathroom scale is always lying to me. Why would he use uncalibrated scales for these critical calculations and jeopardize his life.
    Once again. You can’t fix stupid.

    • Sarah A says

      August 17, 2016 at 12:59 pm

      Calibrated scales are expensive and not always readily available when completing an EAB project but that is still no excuse for not putting in the time and effort to get a proper W&B on a new aircraft, especially one with significant changes from the plans.

      To that I add: The definition of Insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result. This guy was crazy to think it would work any better on the 2nd flight then the 1st if no remedial steps had been taken.

  9. PeterH says

    August 16, 2016 at 8:08 am

    Try again! Maybe it will work the third time??

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines