• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Glassy water contributes to crash

By General Aviation News Staff · September 14, 2016 ·

The pilot reported that he was attempting to land the Super Bearhawk on a lake near Sault Set Marie, Mich., and misjudged the height of the airplane above the water, which he described as “glassy.”

During the touchdown, the left float “dug in,” and the airplane subsequently nosed over.

It is likely that the glassy water conditions adversely affected the pilot’s depth perception, which led to his subsequent failure to judge the height above the water.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilot’s inadequate flare during landing on water with a glassy condition, which resulted in the airplane nosing over.

NTSB Identification: CEN14LA492

This September 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily. Sign up here.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Phil says

    September 14, 2016 at 10:33 am

    Millimeter radars are cheap enough to install in car bumpers. Why not install them in floats with an audio signal to the pilot to indicate the height above the water?

    • PeterH says

      September 14, 2016 at 12:31 pm

      Phil,

      That is probably a great idea – and as a matter of fact – there are a gazillion cool technologies you can install on airplanes that would make flying safer, cheaper, faster, more environmentally friendly, etc. etc.

      HOWEVER, first these technologies must be approved by the FAA and that means that we will either continue to use technology from the 1950s, or we will have to pay so much for an “approved” (and by then obsolete) version of cheap millimeter radar and other cool stuff that we won’t be able to afford it.

      The FAA is from the government and they are here to help us…

      • Richard says

        September 15, 2016 at 7:08 am

        I agree, PeterH. The FAA is the biggest obstacle to improvements in aircraft. The Bearhawk, being experimental, could do it. For example, I notice there are several ADS-B units that are relatively inexpensive but the FAA won’t allow them to be installed in certificated aircraft, however, they are approved for use in experimentals. If they do the job in experimentals, how come they won’t in a certificated aircraft?

        • Carl says

          September 15, 2016 at 11:27 am

          I agree that some of these devices could be very helpful at times. However, thousands of “glassy water” approaches and landings have been made using the proper procedures. Trying to substitute technology for training, skill and proper procedures has proven to be very misguided as of late.

© 2023 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines