The pilot reported that the purpose of the flight was to determine how much unusable fuel was in the experimental amateur-built airplane’s fuel tanks.
The Fisher Classic took off with a full header tank and only 1 gallon of fuel in each wing tank.
After takeoff, the pilot climbed to about 3,500 feet. About three miles from the airport, he switched from the header tank to the right fuel tank. Shortly after, the engine suddenly stopped, and the propeller stopped turning. He quickly switched back to the header tank.
Since the plane was not equipped with a starter, he initiated a dive to attempt to get the propeller spinning, but was unsuccessful in restarting the engine.
He leveled the airplane to attain its best glide speed and proceeded toward a road. He subsequently landed the airplane on a rocky riverbank short of the road near Redlands, California. The pilot sustained minor injuries.
He reported there were no mechanical failures or malfunctions with the engine or airframe that would have precluded normal operation.
He further reported that he should have considered the possibility that the engine might stop and that he should have flown the airplane at a higher altitude and remained closer to the airport where he could have made a dead-stick landing if necessary.
Probable cause: A loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inadequate planning for the test flight, which resulted in insufficient altitude and no suitable place to land in the event of an emergency.
NTSB Identification: WPR15LA123
This March 2015 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.
This kind of stupidity is going to kill someone someday. He needs to turn in his license. PERIOD
Hope he never has to check and see if his gun is loaded !
I believe it was Forrest who said,”stupid is as stupid does”.
You all may recall John Denver and his fatal fuel miscalculation….methinks this pilot got the ‘karma’…why Not ask for help from experience…ie. assistance from an A&P…other homebuilder…jus’ sayin’?
A tail-wheel airplane does not sit at the same attitude as when flying level. Therefore, the fuel level at the time it runs dry might be different than when sitting on the deck.
Raise the tail……duh
Yes, a tailwheel does not sit the same on the ground as it’s normal straight and level flight attitude would be – BUT, the correct way to do this is to raise the tail to the actual level flight attitude and then disconnect the gas line at the carb and funnel the gas into a large bucket. When the flow stops, then you’ll know how much is left as “unusable”.
At what point did he relize he made a big mistake?
He could have done this test on the ground.
Stupid is as Stupid does! You can’t make up stuff like this.
Let me see if I have this right. I’m going to purposefully run a tank dry, and not have sufficient altitude to glide to an airport. Isn’t this a 709 check ride at a minimum? I could see reckless operation for this.
You are going to put 1 gallon in each wing tank, fill the header tank, and fly a plane without a starter, to figure out unusable fuel for each tank beyond the gliding range of the airport?
So, How much unusable fuel was in the tanks? Did he get his data?
How much does this ” TEST PILOT” charge for his service??
IS “planning” spelled with one or two “N’s?