• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Malfunctioning landing gear contributes to accident

By NTSB · July 4, 2017 ·

During an instructional flight in the Piper PA 24-250 near Newton, Kansas, the flight instructor reported that while on final approach at their destination airport, the landing gear did not illuminate down and locked. He tried to cycle the gear with the electric landing gear handle, but the down and locked green light would not illuminate.

When the power was reduced to idle, the flight instructor reported that the audible gear unsafe horn sounded as well.

The flight instructor performed a go-around, and the pilot receiving instruction reported that he began the manual gear extension checklist according to the “SureCheck” checklist.

During the manual gear extension procedure, both pilots reported that a “spring tension” prevented the emergency gear handle from extending to the full forward position.

Subsequently, the flight instructor reset the motor release arm and attempted to extend the landing gear again with the electric gear handle, but the landing gear electric motor circuit breaker popped and the motor release arm jammed.

After receiving confirmation from ground personnel that the landing gear was only partially extended, the flight instructor performed an emergency landing.

During touchdown, the landing gear collapsed and the airplane skidded to a stop on the runway. The fuselage was substantially damaged in the accident.

During a post-accident examination, an FAA aviation safety inspector found that the right main landing gear down-lock micro switch was operating intermittently within the electrical actuating system.

According to the inspector, an intermittent micro switch on this landing gear can result in gear unsafe warnings and continuous electrical motor operation.

Additionally, the SureCheck checklist used did not include instructions provided in the Pilot’s Operating Handbook stating, “Do not re-engage landing gear operating motor in flight.” The SureCheck checklist does contain a warning stating “this product is not a substitute for any operation manual which coincides with each specific aircraft.”

The flight instructor reported that he had two hours of flight time in this make and model airplane, and the pilot receiving instruction reported that he had no previous experience in this make and model airplane.

Probable cause: The failure of the right main landing gear down-lock micro switch, which resulted in a landing gear collapse during landing, and the pilot/owner’s unfamiliarity with the emergency landing gear extension procedure. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor’s lack of experience in this make and model airplane and unfamiliarity with the emergency landing gear extension procedure.

NTSB Identification: GAA15CA178

This July 2015 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Joe Gutierrez says

    July 5, 2017 at 12:09 pm

    Sorry folks, but the Piper Comanche has the easiest gear to put down in any aircraft. It is strictly mechanical and works like a charm. For someone to belly in an airplane simply because they didn’t understand the system is beyond me. All three landing gear are tied together, so when you lower the gear with the three-foot lever that sticks out of the floor they all go down together, it was made this way for assuredness and simplicity. I owned and flew a Comanche 260-B for ten years. I practiced lowering the gear a few times, no problems. Simply slow the plane down to 100 knots release the half nut from the motor driving screw with its own lever on the floor, raise the telescoping rod all the way up, and push forward with your foot or hand and prestow, gear down and locked. Incompetence is very costly…

  2. Stu Brown says

    July 5, 2017 at 8:31 am

    This is another example of why pilots should get instruction from an instructor that is familiar with the type and make of airplane. Type specific organizations can make instructor recommendations. Why people insist on using local flight school instructors, for complex aircraft, is beyond me!

  3. Jim Macklin CFIIASME and A&P says

    July 5, 2017 at 5:18 am

    Abbreviated check lists are great AFTER the POH has been studied in detail, including systems. Complex airplanes are complex because the systems often seem to have been designed by an engineer who studied making systems that were prone to failure and that require certain steps to be followed in a particular sequence.
    Very likely the owner of the airplane avoided system maintenance because of the expense. Often the question is asked, “Do I need to fix that immediately or can it be deferred?”
    The CFI had 2 hours of flight time, I wonder if that included the accident flight.
    Any flight in a model that is different and unfamiliar to student or instructor should include a few hours of ground school covering the POH.
    Obviously this did not happen.

    • Warren Webb Jr says

      July 6, 2017 at 5:49 am

      I’ve seen omissions and/or errors in commercially produced checklists and even in checklists created by the airplane’s operator. These checklists often are laminated or may be printed in a pocket-sized form for durability or convenience. It pays to cross-check every item against the POH checklist.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines