• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Air Racing from the Cockpit: Engine epilogue

By William E. Dubois · October 11, 2017 ·

Dispatch from KSAF, Santa Fe, N.M.: My chief mechanic and I are standing in his hangar, glumly staring at Race 53. Her engine is missing.

Forward of the firewall, black fuel lines, orange air hoses, and white sensor wires dangle in mid air. Her new exhaust stack angles downward at a crazy angle. Her tails are held off the floor by two bags of Quikrete, balanced on a board stretched between her upper engine mounts — ballast to compensate for the missing engine.

I mentally count off the months I’ve been planeless. Most of July. All of August. All of September. Now, it’s clear I won’t have Race 53 back in October. And maybe not even in November.

I take off my hat and run my fingers through my hair. I don’t know what to say. The way this whole thing has unfolded is absolutely unbelievable…

Thar she blows is for whales!

In my last dispatch, the “new” stroker engine had just been pulled back off of Race 53 and sent north again to the rebuild shop. Once there, it was placed on a test stand, our prop was bolted on, the engine was fired up, run up high and…nothing happened. It didn’t blow oil.

What the $%&#@?!

Mystery stroker: Some where deep inside the heart of the engine is the cause of the oil problems, but the team has given up on this particular engine. (Photo by William E. Dubois)

But the case pressure was on the high side. So the master builder decided to pull the cylinders, hone the walls, and change the piston rings. Then he sent it south again.

When it arrived, my crew decided to do a minimalist installation. Maybe it was once burned, twice shy. Maybe they didn’t buy into the piston ring explanation. Maybe they were responding to some inner whisperings from the Universe. But whatever the case, it proved to be a good call.

As soon as the re-rebuilt engine spooled up to high RPM, oil blasted out the breather vent. Again. Still.

I wasn’t there for it, but for hours my two mechanics — on speed dial to the rebuild shop — tried every possible iteration of the breather vent line: Thick hoses, thin hoses, hoses routed over the top of the case, hoses routed down under the bottom the case, vented hoses, un-vented hoses.

To catch the oil, they routed the hoses into a large clear plastic tub that once held a Sam’s Club-sized volume of peanuts. They even tried a dipstick from another Ercoupe that was in the shop for routine maintenance.

No dice.

The only thing that changed with the new rings was that it took 15 seconds at high RPM before the oil blew. Originally, it happened as soon as high RPM was reached. So something had changed. But there was still a problem.

And the engine ran great. Of course, at an oil loss of a pint every couple of seconds, it couldn’t run for very long.

Next, they let the engine keep running once the oil started blasting out to see if the oil loss came in spurts or if it was a steady blast. It was steady. It never let up.

Finally, my chief mechanic called the rebuilder and told him, “It’s time for you to pack your bags and come down here.”

A week later, he did.

One mystery solved

Now, I wasn’t able to be there that day either, but that was probably better for my mechanics. I’m not sure they could have had as frank a conversation as was needed with the owner’s rep standing nearby.

But here’s what I learned: The case pressure, per a Continental Service Bulletin, was being tested by the rebuilder using a rig made up of an oil cap, a hose, and an airspeed indictor. But somewhere in the rig, there must have been a small leak that served to vent off some of the pressure. With the pressure monitor on, the plane didn’t blow oil. With it off, and any oil cap on, it did.

That’s why the engine didn’t blow oil on the test stand either when it was first rebuilt, when it came back, or after the ring job.

But as to what was causing the oil to blast out of the engine, none of them would even fathom a guess. It’s a common engine. It’s a common modification. Yet we are having a most uncommon problem with it.

In the end the master builder decided to forget about trying to understand it. He just threw in the towel. Sort of.

Lisa F. Bentson tries to will the stroker engine to tell her what the heck its problem is. In the background, aircraft owner Jean H. Dubois has given up. (Photo by William E. Dubois)

Musical cases

Did I tell you? To save time (Ha!) we bought a second engine case at the start of this debacle. The brilliant plan was that with a second case, a good portion of the rebuild could be accomplished before the race plane was taken out of service.

Well, it sounded like a good plan at the time, and while no one could imagine how or why a different case could make a difference, the master builder decided it was time to cut his (substantial) losses and move the engine innards out of the new-to-us case and place them back in our plane’s original case.

I never got a satisfactory explanation for why this decision was made. More than anything else, I suspect, it was just the need to try something different, and our old case never gave us any trouble.

The decision made, my guys took the engine off, yet again, and loaded it up in a truck for a third trip up to Colorado. My engine’s getting a lot of miles on it.

Just none of them in the air.

So now I wait. The old case from our engine needs to be inspected and re-certified, and then some modifications need to be made to the inside to accommodate the new 0-200 crank. That alone could take a month.

Then the whole rebuild process needs to take place. Then it needs to be tested, and shipped back down once again, where — no doubt — my guys will do the minimum necessary installation to test it on the plane. To see if the oil geyser has really, once and for all, been stopped.

In the meantime, if the master builder found any smoking gun — any, Ah-ha so that’s what’s causing it! — discoveries as he took Stroker #1 apart, he’s not shared it with us, so I’m guessing he found nothing unusual when he cracked the case open.

So we all remain in the dark, together. If nothing is found, and if the parts dance well together in the original engine case, we may never know what caused our problems. But twice bitten, we all remain beyond shy, expecting the worst.

Engineless once again, Race 53 sits with bags of Quickete on her nose to hold her tails off the ground. Will the third time be the charm? (Photo by William E. Dubois)

No first loser: It’s a three-way tie

My chief mechanic and I are standing in his hangar, glumly staring at Race 53. Her engine is missing. Forward of the firewall, black fuel lines, orange air hoses, and white sensor wires dangle in mid air. Her tails are held off the floor by two bags of Quikrete.

“This,” he tells me, “is one of those cases where everybody loses. You lost your season. I’ve lost a ton of time I won’t be compensated for. The rebuilder lost all his profit, and then some.”

I don’t reply. I put my hat back on. There’s nothing to say.

My mechanic sighs and stares out across the tarmac, his eyes resting on the far distant horizon, “It’s no one’s fault, but, still…” his voice trails off, then he clears his throat. “It’s just a bad deal all the way around.”

My League Points: 840, where it looks likely they will stay. I just went to Enterprise’s website to rent a van so the five of us can drive to the Sport Air Racing League‘s National Championships in relative comfort to get our season end trophy. Still, how humiliating…

My League Standing: Second place in Production airplanes, fifth place overall.

About William E. Dubois

William E. Dubois is a NAFI Master Ground Instructor, commercial pilot, two-time National Champion air racer, a World Speed Record Holder, and a FAASTeam Representative.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Delaminator says

    October 16, 2017 at 11:22 am

    I second Joe on this one.
    It is all in the piston to cylinder clearances. This needs to be meticulously measured and documented. The aerobatic breather fitting helps hide the problem but the crank case pressure needs to be under control.
    The original 0-200 cylinders had choke and were Nitrided. The current production has no choke and is plain steel! You hone them a couple of times and they are oversize.
    I use a differential pressure transducer, CC pressure on one and instrument static on the other side. That info is displayed, recorded and alarmed on my G3x.

  2. Dean says

    October 14, 2017 at 9:09 pm

    Are aircraft engines equipped with a pcv type system ?

  3. Joe Gutierrez says

    October 12, 2017 at 1:08 pm

    Hi Bill, I’ve seen this kind of problem a few times before on newly overhauled engines. If the person honing out the cylinders is’sent paying attention, he can very easily put a reverse choke on the top of the cylinder, that is instead of choking the top of the cylinder, (making it smaller than the bottom of the cylinder) he would make it bigger at the top, and that doesn’t work, the top of the piston is where the compression ring is at and having done that would allow the compression to bypass the compression ring and instead pressurize the crankcase. We have o/hauled a few engines with this machining error. Sometimes it seems like it’s done on purpose. Just my opinion, nothing more, sorry. You might have the engine re-builder measure the cylinders at the top and at the bottom, the top inside the cylinder should measure smaller than the bottom inside the cylinder.

  4. Paul says

    October 12, 2017 at 11:18 am

    A thought : I had a similar but very much smaller problem. I extended the elbow that attaches the breather to the front of the crankcase in to the case by fitting about an inch of tube to it. My problem disappeared and has not returned. Hope this may be helpful.

  5. Dennis Seymour says

    October 12, 2017 at 6:11 am

    Hi as this is the first time in commenting on this and I am not a pilot although I have always had the dream of learning but not the resources living here in Bermuda. I really enjoy reading about your adventures although no enjoyment in reading about your engine problems. There may be one plus to all this and that is if the problem is resolved there is something to be learned here.

  6. Dave Johnson says

    October 12, 2017 at 4:54 am

    I bristle when I see bags of concrete mix used to weigh down an aircraft (I have seen it many times). Concrete mix is HIGHLY corrosive to aluminum. Bags of playsand, barbell weighs from Craigslist…please – ANYTHING but concrete mix!

    • Dave Montgomery says

      October 12, 2017 at 8:14 am

      I own a Cardinal, and when I asked my mechanic how much weight it takes to hold down the tail to service the nose wheel, he said “ five cases of oil”… that’s a new unit of weight measure for me….

      But this has to be one of the saddest, most frustrating stories of aircraft ownership that I’ve ever read… thanks for sharing this.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines