• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Impacts of shortened SMO runway already being felt

By General Aviation News Staff · January 6, 2018 ·

The 10-day closing of Santa Monica Municipal Airport (SMO) in Southern California brought significant ramifications throughout the general aviation and business aviation communities, and those effects will linger now that the airport has reopened with a shorter runway and other infrastructure changes, officials with the National Business Aviation Association say.

FBO Atlantic Aviation saw its business evaporate during the runway closure, yet the facility remained open so employees would not be without paychecks during the year-end holiday season.

“We felt it necessary that they not be penalized by the city’s decision, or its timing,” said Atlantic Aviation SMO General Manager Gregory Wain, who noted that while the runway was closed employees spent time performing facility maintenance.

Private pilot Mark Smith, a photojournalist and owner of a solar business, has relied on his aircraft for business transportation for more than 27 years. He spent more than $400 to relocate his Mooney M20K to Van Nuys Airport (VNY) during the runway closure.

“Signature (FBO) at Van Nuys was massively busy during the closure,” said Smith. “Even after SMO reopened, that continued, thanks to the rollover from traffic that’s now unable to land on the shorter runway.”

While the shorter runway at SMO primarily impacts jets, Smith noted that piston aircraft owners also will be negatively affected.

“It will now be more difficult for me to depart with a full load in Santa Ana conditions,” he explained.

The sole runway at SMO before it was shortened. (Photo courtesy NBAA)

“December is normally a very busy time for us, but December 2017 was very different,” said Rymann Winter, owner of SMO-based aircraft rental and flight training provider Proteus Air Services. “We repositioned most of our fleet to VNY, and I would estimate the runway closure cost us at least $25,000 in lost revenue.”

Josh Olson, executive director at Angel Flight West, said that his organization was forced to cancel numerous health-transport flights during the runway closure, hindering access to necessary healthcare for those patients.

“SMO is a vital hub for not just Angel Flight West flights and our patients and volunteer pilots, but for emergency airlift, disaster relief, animal rescue, and environmental conservancy flights,” explained Olson. “The runway may now be open again, but the shorter length will not allow larger aircraft to access SMO – Angel Flight West’s busiest airport – and that will reduce our efficacy in arranging flights for patients needing travel to/from here, especially longer flights.”

Despite these challenges, aircraft owners continue to express optimism that Santa Monica Airport will remain a vital part of Southern California’s aviation infrastructure.

“I’ve actually been encouraged by the traffic we’ve seen come in here since the airport reopened,” Wain said. “Santa Monica is so uniquely situated that we feel confident the airport will, in time, reinvent itself to some degree. Users will figure out how to come in here with smaller aircraft.”

An unprecedented settlement agreement reached in January 2017 between the FAA and the city of Santa Monica enabled the city to shorten the runway.

NBAA – joined by airport businesses, tenants and users – has a lawsuit pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, challenging the settlement agreement and asserting that it is invalid because the agency failed to comply with numerous federal statutory requirements.

A court decision is expected later this year.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become a better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. lgartistry.com says

    January 8, 2018 at 8:11 pm

    Thanks for finally writing about >Impacts of
    shortened SMO runway already being felt — General Aviation News <Loved it!

  2. PB says

    January 8, 2018 at 12:09 pm

    The lease agreements were clear that the city was constrained only by its acceptance of FAA funds, that time period expiring in 2018, but over 1/3rd of the runway area. The remaining 2/3rds was to be an airport in perpetuity, yet the FAA agreed to total closure in ten years, and that is the outrage.
    There was no legal basis for the closure of the airport, but the closure of the 1/3rd was legally justified.
    The remainder should have been kept open and operating “in perpetuity”. For the FAA to have rolled over on this is beyond outrageous.

  3. gbigs says

    January 8, 2018 at 8:05 am

    Don’t kid yourself. California liberals get what they want by ‘creeping’ their ultimate desires. They did that with marijuana under the ‘ruse’ of medical pot then full recreational use. They do it with faux climate change to destroy commerce. They will get this airport closed…no one with an IQ above 50 does not see that….

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines