• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Cessna cabin doorpost bulkhead cracks lead to proposed airworthiness directive

By General Aviation News Staff · February 3, 2018 ·

A notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for an airworthiness directive (AD) for some Cessna 172, 182, 206, 207, and 210 models was prompted by a report of cracks found in the lower area of the forward cabin doorpost bulkhead.

The NPRM was published to the Federal Register Feb. 1, 2018.

1973 Cessna 182P

The proposed AD would require repetitively inspecting the lower forward doorpost at the strut attach fitting for cracks and making all necessary repairs.

FAA officials said they are proposing the AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

From the NPRM:

Investigation revealed more than four dozen similar cracks on Textron Aviation 100 and 200 airplanes. It has been determined that the cracks result from metal fatigue.

This condition, if not detected and addressed, could result in failure of the wing strut attach point during operation, which could result in loss of control.

It is estimated that 14,653 aircraft will be affected by this AD.

Comments must be received by March 19, 2018.

A full list of Model/Serial Numbers can be seen at FederalRegister.gov.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Dale VanZant says

    February 16, 2018 at 6:58 am

    There are a number of skips in the model/serial number sequences. What are the determining factors that allow my 1979 Hawk XP to be excluded while a serial number ten digits away is included?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines