• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Low altitude, airspeed bad combination

By NTSB · March 29, 2018 ·

The non-certificated pilot reported that he conducted a low approach over the turf runway in Neshkoro, Wisconsin, at 50′ above ground level with the engine power at idle.

About halfway down the runway, he applied full power, but the engine did not respond. He entered a shallow left turn and slowed the Challenger II to stall speed before hitting trees. The pilot was seriously injured in the crash

While the condition of the propeller was consistent with the engine having no power at the time of impact, post-accident examination of the airframe and a test run of the engine revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation, and a reason for the loss of power could not be determined.

The pilot was not certificated, and he did not hold a medical certificate. The pilot’s flight time was unknown.

His decision to maneuver the airplane at a low altitude and low airspeed precluded him from selecting a suitable forced landing site following the loss of engine power.

Probable cause: A total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined. Contributing to the accident was the non-certificated pilot’s decision to maneuver at low altitude.

NTSB Identification: CEN16LA123

This March 2016 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. James Hodges says

    April 7, 2018 at 3:46 pm

    Many FAA probable causes are worthless for helping prevent similar accidents.
    I encountered a “dust devil” about 15 ft high on TO, in a Pietenpol LSA.
    Wingtip touched the ground and I crashed inverted. No injuries.
    Probable cause “ Pilot failed to maintain control of the aircraft “. No mention of the DD!
    Technically correct, but worthless!!

  2. Wayne says

    April 2, 2018 at 11:48 am

    No Certification?
    Stupid is what stupid does.

  3. Bob Hartmaier says

    March 31, 2018 at 5:59 am

    According to Wikipedia, the Challenger line is Light Sport, not Ultra Light. Therefore the pilot should have at least a Light Sport rating. Wonder if he was cited by the FAA.

  4. Charllie Kile says

    March 30, 2018 at 7:05 am

    That aircraft is powered by a Rotax two stroke engine. Following a prolong Idle if the throttle is advanced too rapidly, It will die !

    • Jeff says

      March 30, 2018 at 8:36 am

      Amen to what Charlie said ⬆️

      • Wylbur Wrong says

        April 7, 2018 at 11:33 am

        Ditto.

        And the NTSB of all entities should know this about those engines. All they have to do is get the engine idling for a minute or so, and then go full power. It will become quite apparent when that prop stops rather suddenly.

        All this because I used to work on dirt bikes in the ’70s & ’80s. So this is not new stuff.

    • gbigs says

      April 7, 2018 at 7:39 am

      Simply not true. The Rotax cruise RPM is 5500. Idle RPM is around 1800 to 2000. The engine is built to more precise standards and tolerances than ANY old tech aircraft piston engine like a Continental or Lycoming. There are both fuel injected and carburetor versions. The only way to get a Rotax to quit is to run turn off the key or run out fuel…

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines