• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Sea Dart jet seaplane skimmed into history

By Frederick Johnsen · May 13, 2018 ·

If everything aeronautical seemed possible in the heady post-war jet age, some aircraft designs found where the limitations were.

The Convair F2Y Sea Dart was one of four delta-wing jets in design or production by that San Diego company in the 1950s. Convair embraced the delta planform as its ticket to supersonic performance.

The Convair Sea Dart thunders though its own spray during flight operations on San Diego Bay in the 1950s. Pounding of the hydro ski struts was a problem during testing. (Peter M. Bowers collection)

But early supersonic jet fighters and the restrictions of aircraft carrier decks were problematical, and one alternative was to create supersonic seaplane fighters for the U.S. Navy.

Anyone who has ever skipped a flat stone across a pond knows the physics involved in a planing surface that, when moving fast enough, does not sink beneath the waves. Hydro skis leveraged that phenomenon into flat plates that could keep a moving aircraft skimming on top of the water.

Convair amalgamated hydro skis, a delta wing, and two turbojets into a floating fighter that could get up on extendable skis and take off from a bobbing start on the ocean’s surface.

A Sea Dart in flight over San Diego shows hydro skis extended. High mounted engine inlets were an effort to keep the Sea Dart from ingesting excessive amounts of sea water. (Peter M. Bowers collection)

The Sea Dart was said to be theoretically capable of operations from snow or ice as well. During its test program at San Diego, the F2Y used small wheels on each hydro ski and the lower aft fuselage to permit it to taxi up and down a seaplane ramp.

The idea of a supersonic Navy jet fighter that was independent of aircraft carriers looked attractive.

When at rest on the sea surface, the Sea Dart floated low in the water, its delta wing nearly awash at the trailing edge. As the two Westinghouse jet engines were throttled up, the F2Y gained speed while floating on its hull until sufficient forward motion was achieved to extend the hydro skis and rise into the planing position. From here, the jet’s vastly decreased water friction made takeoff possible.

In the last half of the 1960s, YF2Y-1 Sea Dart number 135765 was secured by the Pacific Northwest Aviation Historical Foundation for possible inclusion in the Museum of Flight. This Sea Dart had been at Seattle’s Sand Point Naval Air Station until the museum moved it to the Renton, Washington, airport as seen. This Sea Dart subsequently made the journey to Lakeland, Florida, where it is displayed in the Florida Air Museum. (Photo by Frederick A. Johnsen)

When the intended J46 jet engines were not ready, the experimental Sea Dart flew with a pair of lower-powered J34s in 1953. Even when J46s were installed, the Sea Dart lacked area-rule fuselage design that could have enhanced supersonic performance. It required a shallow dive to fly faster than the speed of sound, yet this remains a benchmark for any seaplane.

Armament for proposed operational Sea Darts would have included 20-mm cannons and different types of air-to-air missiles.

Tragedy shook the Sea Dart effort on Nov. 4, 1954, when Sea Dart number 135762 came apart in flight over San Diego Bay during a demonstration flight for officials and media. Convair pilot Charles E. Richbourg died from injuries he received.

The rapid advancement of all kinds of aeronautical technologies overtook the Sea Dart even as it tried to push the state of the art with its own design innovations.

The perceived problems of hosting supersonic jets on aircraft carriers were lessened with devices ranging from powerful new steam catapults pioneered by the British to innovative wing and flap designs like the variable incidence wing of the F8U Crusader for the U.S. Navy.

It has been reported that one engineering faction at Convair argued for making the F2Y a more conventional shipboard design, but lost out to the hydro ski proponents.

The Sea Dart from Seattle has spent decades on display at Lakeland, Florida, where thousands of visitors see it at the annual SUN ‘n FUN fly-in as well as on display year round. (Photo by Frederick A. Johnsen)

As a test aircraft, the Convair Sea Dart flew as late as 1957, but its use as an operational jet fighter never happened. Five airframes were built. One was lost in the crash, and the other four survive on display as this is written.

About Frederick Johnsen

Fred Johnsen is a product of the historical aviation scene in the Pacific Northwest. The author of numerous historical aviation books and articles, Fred was an Air Force historian and curator. Now he devotes his energies to coverage for GAN as well as the Airailimages YouTube Channel. You can reach him at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. C.R. Smith, was Stationed at VC-35 Pilot says

    December 29, 2018 at 12:49 pm

    I was next to the water and saw the sequence of the crash of the “Sea Dart” directly off North Island adjacent to where it hit the water. I did not see anyone around for help. I turned around and sighted the tower and started to frantically wave my arms for personnel to see me pointing toward the point of impact.

  2. Jim Macklin says

    May 14, 2018 at 5:54 am

    Aircraft carrier design and technology made the Sea Dart unnecessary. But the idea is sound.
    I wonder what modern computer design programs would do for design and modeling if designs could be “sea and flight tested” with software in a lab.
    Perhaps a college competition could test ideas. A seaplane VTOL that could divert some of the fan air from a modern engine to break the water drag might be interesting?
    Even an EAA build with help from a manufacturer or someone such as Burt Rutan?
    Jim Bede would have done it!

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines