• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fuel mismanagement leads to forced landing

By NTSB · September 21, 2018 ·

The airline transport pilot reported that, before the flight preceding the accident flight, he added 19 gallons of fuel to the Piper PA-30’s auxiliary and main fuel tanks.

He noted that he did not add fuel to the tip tanks and that he had used all the fuel in those tanks during the flight before the accident flight.

He then departed. During the flight, he only used the auxiliary and main fuel tanks and that, while on final approach for landing, he switched from the auxiliary to the main fuel tanks for landing.

Shortly thereafter, the right engine lost power and then the left engine lost power.

He subsequently conducted a forced landing to a road and a field near Mineral Wells, Texas, during which the fuselage and wings were crushed, the empennage was partially separated from the fuselage, and the pilot and one passenger sustained serious injuries.

The examination of both engines, fuel tanks, and related fuel systems revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.

One gallon of fuel was recovered from the right main tank fuel lines, and three gallons were recovered from the left auxiliary tank.

Although no fuel was recovered from the tip fuel tanks, damage signatures on both tip fuel tanks were consistent with both tanks being full of fuel at the time of the accident.

Given this evidence, it is likely that pilot did not use the tip fuel tanks during the previous flight despite believing that he had done so and instead used the main and auxiliary fuel tanks.

The pilot’s fuel mismanagement resulted in fuel starvation to both engines and their subsequent loss of engine power while on final approach to the airport.

Probable cause: The pilot’s fuel mismanagement, which resulted in fuel starvation to both engines and their subsequent loss of engine power.

NTSB Identification: CEN16LA380

This September 2016 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Henry K. Cooper says

    October 2, 2018 at 5:50 am

    Issue #1: Poor planning so that there isn’t some reserve of fuel upon arriving at the destination.

    Issue #2: I haven’t seen an FQI system yet that can’t be adjusted to show zero fuel with 30 minutes left in the tank.

  2. Dave Stark says

    September 24, 2018 at 7:48 pm

    Not again, I have to stop reading this stuff. I just can’t believe the instances of fuel mismanagement on these pages. There are just too many darn stupid people flying aircraft. God help us.

  3. Warren Webb Jr says

    September 24, 2018 at 10:32 am

    I didn’t see anything about problems with the fuel gauges. Maybe he was a victim of ‘expectation bias’ where he looked but didn’t see. A good practice in twins when switching tanks is to carefully monitor the fuel pressure after switching the first tank and not switch the tank on the second engine until you are satisfied all is well with the first. Was the restart procedure (usually switch tanks then fuel pump on) followed?

  4. Marvin says

    September 24, 2018 at 6:56 am

    And he is a airline transport pilot?

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines