• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fuel exhaustion leads to student’s forced landing in a field

By NTSB · December 21, 2018 ·

The solo student pilot reported that, while on a cross-country flight, the weather deteriorated at the destination airport. He decided to complete a touch-and-go landing at an airport along the route and then return to the departure airport.

When he began the flight back to his original point of departure, the Diamond DA-20 had about 3/4 tank of fuel remaining, and a headwind was present.

About 10 to 15 nautical miles from the original departure airport, the fuel supply was exhausted, and the student pilot made a forced landing in a field near Payson, Utah.

During the forced landing, the right wing hit a tree and was substantially damaged.

Probable cause: The student pilot’s improper in-flight fuel planning, which resulted in fuel exhaustion.

NTSB Identification: GAA17CA088

This December 2016 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Sarah A says

    December 25, 2018 at 4:32 pm

    I think that student will get a big “F” for fuel management after such a major foul up. I have seen plenty of incidents brought about by poor fuel management on these links. On all of them I have questioned the quality of their flight training where that should have been pounded into them. I think we know of one instructor now who might have taught them. This pilot new that the intended destination had bad weather and he did a touch and go at an airport when he should have stopped to check the weather and wait for better conditions and just maybe top off the tank. Also just the fact that a 3/4 full tank only got him back to around 15 miles from the destination kind of indicates a lack of fuel reserves as well. If winds were such an important factor in the incident then why does the report taken by the NTSB not include some information on enroute winds that the aircraft encountered. The best I could find was a report from a site 20 miles away where the surface winds were calm.

    Oh and by the way I did a little bit of investigation and found this quote from a witness to the landing who went to his aid:

    “He was fairly calm but he just said, ‘I did a stupid thing,'”

    I think that says it all…

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines