• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Loss of control while landing fatal for Cirrus pilot

By NTSB · January 22, 2019 ·

The pilot was maneuvering in the traffic pattern at the airport in San Antonio, Texas, at the time of the accident.

He entered a continuous right turn from downwind toward the final approach course when he abruptly lost control of the Cirrus SR22.

A witness stated the airplane’s wings were “totally vertical” before it nosed over and descended toward the ground in a wooded area about 1/2 mile southeast from the landing runway threshold. The pilot died in the crash.

A second witness also reported that the wings were nearly vertical before it descended below the tree line. He added that the engine sounded “fine.”

An NTSB performance study revealed that after the airplane entered the airport traffic pattern, it began a continuous right turn from downwind toward the final approach course suggesting that the pilot did not fly a traditional rectangular traffic pattern, but instead flew a circling base to final pattern.

The airplane approached the extended runway centerline in a 48° right bank, at 103 kts and about 220′ agl.

Lateral accelerations began to increase shortly before the accident and varied between 0.37g and 0.62g for the final portion of the flight. The lateral accelerations were consistent with sideslip angles of 15° to 20° during the final turn. The calculated angle-of-attack (AOA) of the wing subsequently exceeded the critical AOA and the airplane entered a descent which ultimately reached 1,800 fpm.

Although the pilot’s control inputs were not directly recorded, the large lateral accelerations are consistent with left rudder input and an uncoordinated flight condition for the airplane.

The Pilot’s Operating Handbook noted that extreme care must be taken to avoid uncoordinated or accelerated control inputs when close to the stall, especially when close to the ground.

If, at the stall, the flight controls are misapplied and accelerated inputs are made to the elevator, rudder, and/or ailerons, an abrupt wing drop may be felt and a spiral or spin may be entered.

The FAA Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3B) notes that coordinated flight is important to maintaining control of the airplane. Situations can develop when a pilot is flying in uncoordinated flight and, depending on the flight control deflections, may support pro-spin flight control inputs.

This is especially hazardous when operating at low altitudes, such as in the airport traffic pattern.

A cross-control stall occurs when the critical AOA is exceeded with aileron pressure applied in one direction and rudder pressure in the opposite direction, causing uncoordinated flight.

The aerodynamic effects of an uncoordinated, cross-control stall can occur with very little warning and can be deadly if it occurs close to the ground. The nose may pitch down, the bank angle may suddenly change, and the airplane may continue to roll to an inverted position, which is usually the beginning of a spin.

Probable cause: The pilot’s uncoordinated flight control inputs and subsequent inadvertent cross-control aerodynamic stall in the airport traffic pattern that resulted in a loss of control and uncontrolled descent with insufficient altitude for recovery.

NTSB Identification: CEN17FA084

This January 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. gbigs says

    February 22, 2019 at 7:02 am

    As a Cirrus pilot I can say he was FAST and his bank angle STEEP. The pattern speeds for the SR22 are 90kts on downwind slowing to 80kts over the numbers. No bank angle steeper than 30 degrees. The non square turn means nothing as long as he had full flaps in the base to final turn unless he was in constant descent, then he could make the turn with half flaps. He would not need light to no rudder inputs if his speed and bank angle were under control.

  2. JimH in CA says

    January 23, 2019 at 9:09 am

    From the NTSB report it looks like a low time pilot in a high performance aircraft got into a low, stall-spin situation, and being cross controlled in a steep turn led to the stall….very sad for a mid-time Air Force pilot.

  3. Omar says

    January 23, 2019 at 4:52 am

    It’s simple. Ignorance plus panic = crash. QED

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines