• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

First solo after long period of not flying goes awry

By NTSB · July 25, 2019 ·

The private pilot reported he had recently returned to flying after a lengthy period of inactivity and that this was his first solo flight after completing a comprehensive flight review.

According to the pilot, after completing the traffic pattern, he landed the Cessna 172 at the midpoint of the 2,400′ runway at the airport in Factoryville, Pennsylvania, with 10 knots of excess airspeed and a slight tailwind. Despite maximum braking, the airplane overran the departure end of the runway and hit dense brush, which resulted in substantial damage to the engine firewall.

Probable cause: The pilot’s failure to attain the proper touchdown point, which resulted in a runway overrun.

NTSB Identification: ERA17CA250

This July 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. chip Spencer says

    July 26, 2019 at 9:57 pm

    Years ago, on my first cross country flight after soloing, I flew from my home base (Ukiah, Calif.) To Willits, Ca., a little farther north. I asked my CFI how the Willits airport was. She only said, ” Stay focused and think about what you’re doing.” After a short flight, I looked at the airport and couldn’t believe my eyes. At the end of the runway (landing end) was a cliff that went down about 400 ft into a canyon. The runway started about 50ft. beyond the cliff! This story brought me back to that moment in 1966. I landed a little too far up the runway, but had plenty of room. I would like to think that tho it was my first cross country, I’d have sense enough to abort if I overshot the runway too far, but my knees were knocking together and I might have done the same thing.

  2. gbigs says

    July 26, 2019 at 6:04 am

    He just had a flight review…didn’t anyone notice his lack of skills/judgement for stabilized landing approaches? Make ya wonder what flight reviews are actually for….

  3. Ernest Hendrickson MD says

    July 26, 2019 at 4:43 am

    Obviously anxiety lead to poor judgement. A go-around was called for, even on the landing roll. But panic causes errors.

  4. JimH in CA says

    July 25, 2019 at 3:42 pm

    It looks like 4 hours of instructional flight wasn’t enough to unsure stabilized landings. A 4kt tailwind isn’t a big problem, but touching down 1,200 ft past the approach end should have been a go-around, especially on a short runway.!

    I see a lot of pilots coming over the numbers at 30-40 ft and land about 1,000 ft down the runway.
    I prefer to land 500 ft down, or less for a short field landing and not need brakes to slow and turn off…retract the flaps and full nose up elevator to use aero-braking..

    Then there’s those guys flying ‘bomber’ patterns more than 1/2 mile abeam on downwind and turn base 3/4 mile past the approach end, then drag it in on a very long final…. try a power-off 180 and see how far from the runway you’ll crash.?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines