• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Go-around goes awry

By NTSB · October 4, 2019 ·

The pilot reported that, during a familiarization flight in an American Spitfire II ultralight, he took off and “noticed a strong left turning tendency.”

He added that he “kept the power at a higher, time restricted setting,” which resulted in the coolant temperature rising above the 180°F maximum operating temperature.

Although there were no indications of performance degradation, he “became concerned” that the airplane could lose engine power due to overheating and decided to make a precautionary landing.

During the landing near Camarillo, California, the airplane bounced, and he decided to go around.

Subsequently, the airplane hit a hangar roof about 75′ left of the runway centerline and then came to rest on the opposite side of the hangar.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage.

Probable cause: The pilot’s failure to track the runway centerline during an attempted go-around, which resulted in hitting a hangar.

NTSB Identification: GAA18CA002

This October 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Gregory Black says

    October 7, 2019 at 4:09 pm

    Even if you have tons of flying time, an ultralight is a whole different beast. Low entry price and experience level probably lures folks that should have taken the longer, more involved route to getting airborne.

  2. gbigs says

    October 7, 2019 at 4:45 am

    The NTSB report says he was a 51 yo sport pilot with 115 total hours. He simply did not have enough experience to deal with what in his mind was a crises (not clear it was a crises). So he panicked, bounced a hurried landing, took off again and really got disoriented missing the center-line by 75 feet and hitting the hangar. This guy should seriously consider not going back up alone…and doing a bunch of emergency procedures and short final landings.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines