• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Two die when 172 hits power lines spanning Mississippi River

By NTSB · October 14, 2019 ·

After takeoff, the pilot proceeded south until reaching the Mississippi River when he proceeded to fly along the river at a low altitude.

As the Cessna 172 approached a bend in the river near Ramsey, Minnesota, he entered a shallow left turn to follow the river. The airplane hit power lines spanning the river that were located about 200 yards beyond the bend. Both the pilot and passenger died in the crash.

Ground-based video footage and witness statements indicated that the airplane was at or below the height of the trees lining both sides of the river shortly before encountering the power lines.

One witness initially thought that the pilot intended to fly under the power lines due to the low altitude of the airplane. Several witnesses also noted that the sound of the engine seemed normal and steady before the accident.

The power lines were below the level of the trees on either side of the river.

Red aerial marker balls were installed on the power lines at the time of the accident.

Weather conditions were good at the time of the accident, however, the sun was about 9° above the horizon and aligned with the river. It is likely that the position of the sun in relation to the power lines hindered the pilot’s ability to identify the hazard as he navigated the bend in the river at low altitude.

In addition, the location of the power lines relative to the river bend minimized the reaction time to avoid the lines.

FAA regulations prohibit operation of an aircraft less than 500′ above the surface in uncongested areas unless approaching to land or taking off, and at least 1,000′ from obstacles in congested areas. They also prohibit operations in a reckless manner that endanger the life or property of another.

Based on the available information, the airplane was less than 100′ above the river and within 400′ of the residences located along the river during the final portion of the flight.

The pilot’s flight instructor described the pilot as “reckless” because of his habit of low-level flying.

While the location of the bend in the river and the position of the sun relative to the power lines may have hindered the pilot’s ability to see and avoid the lines, it was the pilot’s decision to operate the airplane along the river at a low altitude contrary to applicable regulations and safety of flight considerations that caused the accident.

Probable cause: The pilot’s decision to fly along the river at a low altitude contrary to applicable regulations and safety of flight considerations which resulted in the impact with the power lines. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inability to see the and avoid the power lines due to their proximity to a bend in the river and the position of the sun at the time of the accident.

NTSB Identification: CEN18FA011

This October 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. JimH in CA says

    October 14, 2019 at 8:23 am

    This crash, [ not an accident ], supports the old pilot saying; ‘there are old pilots and there are bold pilot; but there are no old, bold pilots’.
    It is sad that this pilot would not listen to his instructor, and probably others to not fly so low, below 500 ft.

    • RudyH says

      October 15, 2019 at 6:52 am

      (Instructor: find an FAA method of retracting your endorsements…before that fool pilot killed people/destroyed property) ??

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines