• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Rising costs leads museums to suspend B-17 operations

By General Aviation News Staff · February 1, 2020 ·

Officials with the National Warplane Museum in Geneseo, New York, have decided they can no longer afford to fly the late David Tallichet’s Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress, and will return the aircraft to the warbird collector’s estate.

The B-17 is known as The Movie Memphis Belle, because of the markings the aircraft gained during the making of the 1988 film, Memphis Belle. The museum has leased the B-17 for the past four years.

The Movie Memphis Belle at SUN ‘n FUN 2018. (Photo by Jose Ramos)

According to a report in Warbird Digest, this follows an announcement by the Lone Star Flight Museum in Houston, Texas, that it does not plan to fly its B-17 or B-25 in 2020.

In a statement on its website, Lone Star officials said “Due to rising operational expenses, sales of flights and passenger operations on our B-25 and B-17 are suspended for the remainder of 2020. We will evaluate flying status at the end of the year.”

On Facebook, museum officials noted the B-17 is not retired or grounded.

“We have only suspended flying for the remainder of this year. We will maintain the B-17 in airworthy condition and will evaluate flying status at the end of the year,” officials said. “Our B-17 is an important part of our warbird collection and will continue to be on display at the museum and open periodically for tours. We hope you all visit the museum very soon to see it and the other aircraft we have on display.”

Meanwhile, officials at the National Warplane Museum, in their announcement about “The Movie Memphis Belle,” said “in light of the increasing hourly operating and insurance costs in connection with the aircraft, the museum’s board of trustees has decided to cease operating the airplane effective immediately and terminate the lease of the aircraft. We have notified the Tallichet family and are working through the process of returning the aircraft.”

According to the report at Warbird Digest, “it is important to note that the B-17 is not being grounded, just that the National Warplane Museum has decided they can no longer justify the resources necessary to both lease and operate the aircraft. Presumably, the aircraft will find another home where she will continue flying, but this is not a given, sadly, in today’s environment.”

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Léon Pesché says

    February 3, 2020 at 7:16 am

    have the original copy of the Memphis Belle war film. The movie film was made with a B17 ( not a G model) from DUXFORD UK. Also had Capt. Jim Verinis , Copilot of the Memphis Belle as a guest in Luxembourg1998 ( registration A-DF )

    P.S. will send you a photo

  2. Captain Dave Pyett BSc., Dip laws. F.AIN. says

    February 3, 2020 at 4:26 am

    The insurance industry needs to be kicked in the balls over the unhelpful attitude in relation to warbird and older aircraft premiums, which are not related to any obvious increase in risk. Maybe older aircraft should simply fly without insurance. Hull risks should be borne by owners/operators, passengers can sign blood chits despite the lawyers clamouring for their cut, and third party risks (eg a/c crashes on someone) maybe covered by an industry scheme. See if the EAA can suggest how to do it.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines