A June 2023 research project published by the University of Reading in the United Kingdom and the American Geophysical Union revealed significant increases in clear air turbulence (CAT) over the past 40 years, an ominous indication of what’s likely to come in the future.
Study co-author Dr. Paul Williams noted the largest increases were over the United States and the North Atlantic, with a 55% increase in severe or greater CAT in 2020 compared to 1979.
Those changing weather patterns create a greater risk for turbulent skies for all aviation, including general and business aviation.
That’s why officials with the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) advise pilots to use the latest tools available to predict areas of turbulence.
One resource is the Aviation Weather Center (AWC) operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Weather Service (NWS). AviationWeather.gov offers a wealth of weather information, including convective forecasts and an interactive Flight Path Tool that disseminates all weather products available for a given route, NBAA officials report.
“We’ve made tremendous advances over just the past few years, thanks to improved weather forecast models with more data going into [them] and better understanding of the science in these models,” said Jennifer Stroozas, warning coordination meteorologist for the Aviation Weather Center. “That results in better forecast information across the board, including when evaluating the potential for turbulent conditions.”
One result of this effort is the Graphical Turbulence Guidance tool that lists SIGMETs (significant meteorological hazards) for turbulence and pilot reports in both graphic and text formats, ranging from 1,000 feet above ground level up to 50,000 feet.
Graphical airman’s meteorological information, or G-AIRMETs, provide greater understanding not only of areas with predicted turbulence, but also the mechanical factors that drive such forecasts.
“We’ve definitely seen improved NOAA and NWS forecasts over the past decade through use of ensemble prediction tools and more data,” said Dean Snell, manager of NBAA Air Traffic Services at the FAA’s Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC) in Warrenton, Virginia. “They’re able to take that information and assemble it in new, more accurate products that provide better predictions.”
What Causes Turbulence?
Turbulence occurs with rapid variations in wind speed and altitude, creating wind shear.
“Those can be quite large,” said Williams, who is a professor of atmospheric science in the Department of Meteorology at University of Reading in the United Kingdom. “In scale, we’re looking for rapid variations in wind speed and altitude that create wind shear.”
“You must understand that air is a fluid, just not one as thick as water,” added Jeff Wofford, former chair of the NBAA Safety Committee. “A river might be nice, smooth and calm, or you might encounter ‘rapids’ that make the current choppy and bumpy.”
“The exact same thing happens with the air,” he continued. “As wind speed increases, and it goes over topographic obstacles like mountains, things get stirred up and that causes eddies and turbulence. Especially in the Rockies during wintertime, you get into mountain wave situations even up at 35,000 feet.”
A relatively new method to forecast turbulence involves tracking eddy dissipation rates that stimulate turbulence.
“These are little swirling air currents or vortices that are about 200 meters in length,” Williams said.
While current atmospheric models offer a typical resolution of a few kilometers in a three-dimensional mesh, Williams noted these still capture the processes that generate turbulence.
“Once we know where the wind shear is from the forecasting model, we have a set of equations we can use to figure out the turbulence,” he said.
Clear air turbulence (CAT) poses further challenges.
“Thermal CAT is difficult to predict as it’s on the microclimate scale,” Stroozas said. “Other clear air turbulence is associated with a jet stream, which is more prominent in the wintertime. While we can’t see it, we know that changes in wind speed and direction cause it, and we have models to give us an idea where that may be.”
Back to Basics
While technological improvements have driven advances in predicting turbulence, Stroozas noted that traditional tools like radar, satellite observations, and PIREPs remain at the heart of all aviation weather forecasts.
“We’re able to better drill down on certain areas, and the different algorithms that are now available allow us to watch for different signals to what’s happening as the weather of the day unfolds,” she said. “There’s also a variety of different weather models that are available to aviation weather forecasters to try to detect some of these signals out in the future, including forecast models specifically for turbulence.”
Those improved forecasts are most welcome for pilots.
“When I did my PhD on turbulence 20 years ago, pilots told me they simply ignored the turbulence forecasts because they were so often wrong,” Williams said. “They were about 60% accurate back then; now we’re closer to 85%.”
The NBAA’s Wofford urges pilots to remember the basics from their earliest days of flight training.
“Get a good weather briefing,” he said. “If you’re doing a self-briefing, look at all the charts and understand what you’re dealing with for that particular flight.”
“The most important tool we have is a Mark One-model eyeball,” Wofford added, referring to the old military term for using your eyes. “If you take a proactive stance versus reactive, you’re going to be a lot better off.”
According to NBAA officials, the Aviation Weather Center recently launched an experimental trial version of its improved AWC resource that offers an even more informative and easy-to-use interface. You can check it out at Beta.AviationWeather.gov.
3 great comments on the Earth’s continuously changing climate, which we now live in, in the post ice age warm period, which will continue for some decades or centuries.
Some actually predict that we are nearing the end of the current warm period and that the Earth will again experience another ice age. I hope that I’m not alive to see it.!!
FYI, good climate info on, https://wattsupwiththat.com/
Sounds like more hot air from pointy-headed academics based on the myth of global warming. I have flown airlines regularly since the early 1980s, including at least one trip for business to Europe, South America or Japan / Korea every year. If anything, instances of CAT affecting commercial aviation have decreased with aircraft being able to climb faster, cruise at higher altitudes, and avoid rough air. I still remember bouncing around thunderstorms in unpressurized commuter aircraft in the 70s and 80s, great fun but not so much for most passengers. This report sounds like a fabricated problem with an expensive government solution, how government agencies and university researches secure funding for pet projects. I don’t believe any of it – and I have been doing fluids modeling including turbulence predictions since the late 1970s, before the term “CFD” became common.
I don’t believe CAT has increased one bit in my 39 years of flying all over the US.
You ALWAYS need to cite the sponsor of a climate study and that usually tells you all you need to know. Really, it’s worse over the United States??? Not a little bit of Canada or Mexico. What a coincidence. Not over China, the most polluting country on earth??? Just because your tools have improved and you are now able to see more CAT, doesn’t mean there’s more of it. It just means you were under-predicting how much was always there.
The study comes from the country that brought us Climate-Gate. I’ve seen no evidence that the UK is no longer faking data to appease their study sponsors. It appears the country known for Climate-Gate is using NOAA data who was caught faking data under the Obama admin (at his request) and who has an entire website dedicated to their data faking history. Not even the FBI has that.
I believe NOAA has been over-predicting CAT the last 10 years or so and I’ve told them that many times. To General Aviation News – you need to do a lot more homework before publishing nonsense like this!
How much has air travel above 30000 feet MSL grown in between 1979 and 2020? Increased opportunities to encounter CAT contributes to the perceived increase in CAT encounters. I am not discounting the final estimate, but increased number of flights above 30K warrant better forecasts and flight planning by aircrews.
It’s great to know that we have much better capabilities to predict weather for the aviation sector, and its obvious that as we have a great deal more commercial flights than in the past, we will also have more continuous weather observations (pireps).
However, as a multi-degreed career earth scientist I am disappointed at the observations at the start of the article stating “we have more turbulence than we did 40 years ago!” The present level of panic and distress over “Climate Change” is ludicrous, it is as though climate was, or should be, static because advanced humans arrived on the scene and started observing it! Climate, throughout Earth’s history, has always been changing!
I could say a great deal more regarding the speculations and statements in the article, but will conclude with what is obviously the most non-scientific component: The “study” chose to compare “1979 to 2020, certainty not a broad basis for a conclusion, and very likely cherry-picked to support their agenda.
Lastly — Contrary to the current frenzy, “climate change” does not always imply only for the worse, or catastrophically bad weather!