• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Navy’s factory went small with the SA-1

By Frederick Johnsen · March 4, 2024 ·

Trusses and wires gave the SA-1 sufficient strength for its flight loads, as seen in this 1919 rear view photo. (Photo from the Peter M. Bowers collection)

As World War I created a boom in aircraft design and manufacturing in the United States, the Army and the Navy each staked out their turf.

Navy planners were concerned that commercial aircraft builders would be consumed building Army airplanes.

So the Navy inaugurated its own in-house aircraft construction facility, the Naval Aircraft Factory, in Philadelphia in 1917. Early efforts included construction of Curtiss flying boats, considered a must for the seaborne service.

In the brief years before catapults and more powerful scout-observation aircraft shaped the mission for airplanes to be carried by cruisers and battleships, the Naval Aircraft Factory envisioned a squat, triangular cross-section monoplane as a Ships Aircraft (or Ship’s Aircraft), a unique early designator that was soon tossed by the wayside.

The resulting SA-1 was created to explore the ability to take off and land on a battleship.

The SA-1 parked in moist soil for this portrait, dated Feb. 5, 1919, on the back of this Naval Aircraft Factory photo. Rustic simplicity of the airframe is evident. (Photo from the Peter M. Bowers collection)

The SA-1 was diminutive, simple, and open air, with small wheels complementing wooden landing skids. Even after ailerons were the norm, the SA-1 used the earlier style of wing warping for roll control.

It looks like a graceful bit of reflex camber was built into the wooden wing ribs of the SA-1 in a wing without hinged ailerons, as seen in this Navy photo from Jan. 10, 1919. (Photo from the Peter M. Bowers collection)

Not much has been written about the SA-1, although the original creator of the Of Wings & Things column, Peter M. Bowers, gave his studied engineering critique of the machine many years ago. Pete found the triangular fuselage shape to be good at furnishing rigidity, but he questioned some of the specific load paths designed into the structure of the SA-1.

The SA-1 had skid-like lower longerons that supported a simple axle and two small wheels, lashed in place with rubber cord.

Pete, and at least one other source on the SA-1, compare the 1919 machine to a modern ultralight.

The SA-1 was powered by a three-cylinder Lawrance L-3 engine of nominally 55 horsepower. It spanned 27 feet, 8 inches with its simple wing. Wing spars were lightweight routed spruce. The airplane had a length of 21 feet, 8 inches.

A three-cylinder Lawrance air-cooled engine produced about 55 horsepower for the tiny SA-1, as seen in construction photos dated Jan. 27, 1919. (U.S. Navy via Peter M. Bowers collection)

Photos of the open-framed SA-1 show the short-lived roundel style of the U.S. national insignia, instead of a white star on a blue field. The colors were a red outer ring, blue inner ring, and white center.

The use of red-white-and-blue roundels of differing color sequences was an Allied identification expedient during World War I. The British, French, and the Russians used different sequences to identify their aircraft, but the overall effect was to depict the machines as red-white-and-blue Allied aircraft and not black-cross-emblazoned German warplanes.

The United States used a classic white star on a blue field insignia, capped with a red center disc to the star. When Russia pulled out of the war first, their roundel colors were adopted by the U.S. in February 1918, and were not replaced with the star logo until well into the post-war summer of 1919.

A5570 was the first SA-1 built, and it shows the U.S. roundel-style wing insignia of 1918-1919. (Photo from the Peter M. Bowers collection)

The comprehensive serial number lists compiled by Joe Baugher indicate only two SA-1s were built, numbered A5570 and A5571. These were followed by a pair of SA-2s, numbered A5572 and A5573, featuring fabric-covered fuselages and wings of slightly greater span. It has been said the final SA-2 used ailerons instead of wing-warping for control.

A pilot settles into the cockpit of the open-air SA-1. (Photo from the Peter M. Bowers collection)

With a run of only four aircraft and the onset of better technologies for furnishing ships with their own aircraft, the little wood-and-fabric SA-1s and SA-2s were like a short-lived hobby shop project.

Once they were a gleam in someone’s eye, but soon they were passed by.

The SA-2 iteration of the Ship’s Airplane featured a fabric-covered fuselage, and a strut-braced wing of slightly greater span. (Bernard Smith Collection at the Archives Branch, United States Marine Corps History Division)

Remembering Joe Baugher

Joe Baugher’s name is synonymous with his massive online historical listing of American military aircraft serial numbers and brief related data that aviation historians and enthusiasts refer to constantly.

We used his work to corroborate aspects of the fleeting Naval Aircraft Factory SA-1 and SA-2.

Joe Baugher died in November 2023 at the age of 82. His contributions to aviation history will be remembered and plans are underway to keep his website available and updated.

In some circles, just noting that “Joe Baugher says…” is sufficient to end any question on the veracity of an aircraft’s pedigree.

About Frederick Johnsen

Fred Johnsen is a product of the historical aviation scene in the Pacific Northwest. The author of numerous historical aviation books and articles, Fred was an Air Force historian and curator. Now he devotes his energies to coverage for GAN as well as the Airailimages YouTube Channel. You can reach him at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Budd Davisson says

    March 5, 2024 at 8:36 am

    Fred,
    You are the ace of the base in coming up with aircraft most of us have never heard of but enjoy reading about. Nicely done!

    • Bob Hearst says

      March 5, 2024 at 10:32 am

      Why bother with a motor,just tow it behind the admiral’s yacht (or battleship).Like the WW2 German one man heli.

    • Fred Johnsen says

      March 5, 2024 at 10:34 am

      Budd,

      Thank you so much. It’s folks like you, and Pete Bowers, who set the example for me years ago.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines