• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Alaska’s avgas anxiety

By General Aviation News Staff · March 23, 2025 · 5 Comments

A GippsAero Airvan next to a fuel truck at an Alaskan airport. (Photo courtesy NBAA)

As the quest to make general aviation lead-free by 2030 continues, pilots and aircraft owners in Alaska are apprehensive about the final solution.

At the recent 2025 Alaska Air Carriers Association Convention, the two sessions that received the most attention — at least from piston-engine aircraft operators — were the Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emission (EAGLE) presentation and the Alaska Unleaded Avgas Transition Forum.

Launched in 2022, EAGLE is a government-industry initiative consisting of the aviation and petroleum industries and U.S. government agencies, along with a wide range of other constituents and interested parties, working toward the transition to lead-free aviation fuels for piston-engine aircraft by the end of 2030 without compromising the safety or economic health of the general aviation industry.

Unlike most of the U.S., where freight carriers primarily operate turbine-powered aircraft, the need to operate from many of Alaska’s shorter, unimproved runways requires the use of a variety of piston-engine aircraft, ranging from small Piper Super Cubs to large cargo DC-3s and -6s, according to officials with the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA).

“Alaska is totally unique in business aviation due to its strong dependence on piston-engine aircraft,” said Phil Derner, NBAA director, Western region. “A significant majority of the rural villages don’t have any access by road, so everything they need for daily life must be delivered by ‘air mail.’ Any disruption would have catastrophic effects.”

“Alaskan aircraft operators view the EAGLE initiative as a proactive, problem-solving effort aimed at finding a safe, reliable, and cost-effective replacement for 100 low-lead before it becomes unavailable,” said Will Day, executive director of the Alaska Air Carriers Association. “Without a dependable source of avgas, many Alaskans would lose their only access to numerous critical services, including medical care, groceries, and mail.”

While many wish the solution to be a drop-in 100LL replacement, it’s not that simple, according to NBAA officials. With the wide array of engine types in use throughout Alaska, aircraft owners are worried that whatever the final replacement fuel is, it won’t be immediately approved for all these engine types.

This is a common concern for owners of legacy aircraft. It is possible that these engines will not achieve optimal performance on a new fuel or may require expensive modifications to achieve the required performance and reliability requirements, officials noted.

“To provide an alternative in Alaska, the candidate fuel must be thoroughly tested and approved to meet safety standards,” Day said. “Alaska is unique in its infrastructure. In many remote locations, aviation fuel is often stored for up to a year in temperatures ranging from minus 50° to above 100°. It must be very stable.

“Because much of the fuel reserves have to be barged or flow into the villages, the statewide fuel infrastructure cannot support multiple avgas types,” he added. “And that will make it impractical to offer 100 low-lead alongside an unleaded alternative. It would just be too difficult and expensive.”

Both Derner and Day stressed that one of the strongest messages shared during the event was that whatever the final alternative fuel is, it will only be selected after passing a battery of safety and performance tests.

Day emphasized that regardless of the final fuel selection, Alaskan aircraft owners will only utilize it when they are certain it is safe, stable and affordable.

“An unproven transition could lead to safety risks, increased costs, and operational disruptions, affecting essential services in Alaska,” he said.

Derner added that while many questions remain, meetings like this are critical to keeping the entire general aviation community informed about the evolving situation.

“These sessions offered us a great opportunity to personally engage with our Alaskan friends and partners to show them what EAGLE is working on,” he said. “And to assure them of our dedication to finding a safe and accessible solution that will satisfy all of Alaska’s unique needs.”

For more information: NBAA.org, FlyEAGLE.org

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Matt says

    March 25, 2025 at 5:03 am

    Liberal activists want to delete GA. Hopefully new Administration will put a stop to all this Green new scam!

    Reply
  2. KlausM says

    March 23, 2025 at 9:36 am

    Alaskan aircraft owners don’t get “Anxiety” over anything. Since the very beginning of time the People and the Pilots of the North Country “Adapt”. That includes the Canadians. Most of the commercial operators have already replaced avgas 100 engines. The rest will do whatever they have to over the next five years.

    Super Cubs will be fine with whatever fuel they can get their hands on. For over 70 years Super Cub and Skywagon Pilots have always figured out how to operate in the middle of nowhere. They’re unstoppable. The first aircraft on Mars will be a Super Cub. 😀

    “Anxiety” – That’s a California word isn’t it???

    Reply
    • JimH in CA says

      March 23, 2025 at 2:04 pm

      more like anxious idiots..!!
      [ I live in No.CA, up in the foothills , away from the lib cities. ]

      I’ve have the mogas stc forever, but never found any without ethanol.!

      Reply
      • Ghery S. Pettit says

        March 23, 2025 at 9:47 pm

        The parting words from the salesman as we drove our 1986 Dodge van from the lot, after buying it new, were. “Whatever you do, don’t put ethanol in it!”. Less than a year later California mandated “oxygenated” gasoline. Translation – they put ethanol in all gasoline. And less than a year later I found out why the salesman said to not put ethanol it it as I has gas pouring over the top of the engine. Ethanol ate the seals out of the fuel system. Did California offer to pay the expense of fixing the fuel system? Who are you kidding. Good luck!

        Reply
        • Shary says

          March 29, 2025 at 5:54 am

          In California, they probably would have fined you for driving a “defective” car (or some other similar excuse) 😉

          Reply

Leave a Reply to Ghery S. Pettit Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines