• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Takeoff goes awry on significantly shorter runway than planned

By General Aviation News Staff · July 19, 2025 · 6 Comments

The pilot reported that the density altitude conditions were increasing but were within takeoff performance limits.

During taxi to his planned departure runway at the airport in Elko, Nevada, he was informed that the runway was closed, so he chose to depart from a different runway about 4,400 feet shorter than originally planned for.

During takeoff the Piper PA-28-140 did not have the performance necessary to attain rotation speed before the end of the runway, but the pilot did not abort the takeoff.

He rotated the airplane 5-10 knots too slow and was unable to clear a fence off the departure end of the runway.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings and fuselage, while the pilot and his passenger sustained minor injuries.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s failure to ensure adequate airplane performance before taking off from a significantly shorter runway than originally planned for.

NTSB Identification: 192686

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This July 2023 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. William Hunt says

    July 23, 2025 at 5:54 am

    The Cherokee 140 is a wonderful little airplane, but you have to respect its limits. Start with the back seats, don’t use them. Then the fuel, unless you’re headed somewhere far away, only fill it to the tabs. Any kind of density altitude??? Fly in the morning.

    Reply
  2. Warren Webb Jr says

    July 22, 2025 at 7:41 am

    Considering he was based at the airport, it’s a bit confusing as to why the airplane’s performance was any surprise. He was taking a friend along for some aviation orientation and sight seeing. Was this another case of an external factor negatively influencing a go/no-go decision?

    Reply
    • JimH in CA says

      July 22, 2025 at 9:21 am

      The POH specifies using 25 deg flaps for a short field takeoff. The pic shows ‘0’ flaps.
      It should have been able to takeoff in 3,000, but maybe not much altitude, but probably more than a 6 ft fence.!!

      So, it was a poor understanding of the aircraft performance.

      Reply
  3. Alex Nelon says

    July 22, 2025 at 4:50 am

    At the rate we’re breaking airplanes there won’t be many left. I recently went on Barnstormers and the first three pages of browsing were filled with parts and services – it was on page 4 that I finally found an airplane.

    Reply
  4. JimH in CA says

    July 19, 2025 at 2:38 pm

    A huge mistake, with the DA at 7,100 ft, the POH takeoff chart is ‘invalid’ about 7,000 ft DA.
    So, a 3,000 ft runway was about 500 ft too short for this low powered aircraft.!!

    Reply
    • JimH in CA says

      July 19, 2025 at 2:39 pm

      typo…that’s ‘above 7,000 ft’….

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines