• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pilot accidentally moves fuel selector to off

By General Aviation News Staff · September 16, 2025 · 9 Comments

Damage to the wing.

The pilot reported they were on a local flight and, while attempting to balance the fuel load, moved the fuel selector valve from the “left” main tank position to the “right” position.

The Aeronca 11AC subsequently lost engine power.

The pilot was not able to restart the engine and performed a precautionary landing onto a road near Apple, Idaho.

Shortly after touchdown, the airplane veered off the road and into a ditch. The wings and engine truss sustained substantial damage. The pilot suffered minor injuries in the crash.

Post-accident examination of the airplane revealed that fuel was present in the fuel tanks and that the fuel selector valve positions available were WING TANKS (9 o’clock position), MAIN TANK (12 o’clock position), and OFF (3 o’clock position).

Fuel tank positions.

The pilot reported that he moved the fuel selector valve from the “left” tank, which was actually the WING TANKS position, to the “right” tank, which was actually the OFF position.

Probable Cause: Fuel starvation due to the pilot’s incorrect movement of the fuel selector valve to OFF, which resulted in a loss of engine power.

NTSB Identification: 193090

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This September 2023 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Michael Gorman says

    September 20, 2025 at 11:22 am

    Had an early Beech Musketeer. Had a similar handle that had a little pointer like that which was the actual selector indicator, not the handle. If you came out of a 172 you might use the handle as the indicator. Not a smart design. Caused a few accidents.

    Reply
  2. Tom Rendet says

    September 20, 2025 at 9:45 am

    The shaft on those valves only allows the handle to go on in one orientation.

    The problem is with the part on the valve that allows specific direction and degree of travel. Those can be set as desired when the valve is assembled.

    Some people want the small pointer to show valve selection, some want the larger easier to see handle to show what is selected.

    Over the last 60-70 years many have been changed or replaced so there is NO common standard even among different aircraft of the exact same type.

    They need to be painted red on the pointer, or modified to remove the small pointer if that isn’t used to indicate the valve selection. An arc on the placard set at a radius approximately equal to the pointer or the handle length (which ever shows the selected position) is also an intuitive help.

    Too late to get everyone to agree on which end of the handle to use for indication – but these controls need to be to made impossible to misunderstand.

    Reply
  3. Clifford Lockyer says

    September 20, 2025 at 7:24 am

    Something so simple as a fuel selector could cause an accident for an unaware pilot

    Reply
  4. Scott Patterson says

    September 20, 2025 at 4:46 am

    Amazing how often a single action requiring 1 second of the pilots attention brings down an aircraft.

    Reply
  5. Frederick Melick says

    September 17, 2025 at 3:36 pm

    Looks like the primer is unlocked. Not sure about the position of the handle. It does not match the description in the text,

    Reply
    • Francis Koester says

      September 24, 2025 at 6:12 am

      Good eye!

      Reply
  6. bob hearst says

    September 17, 2025 at 1:00 pm

    Garbage fuel selector . Looks to me like the handle is upside down too.
    There should be an”OFF detent to prevent this. Many fuel selectors are in tuff to see positions and require attention that can be used elsewhere. If you go by ‘feel’ this can happen. True, fearless flyer should have known better but anything that can be done
    by the manufacturer or maintenance to eliminate this dangerous risk should be done.

    Reply
  7. Mitch says

    September 17, 2025 at 5:06 am

    Not familiar with the aircraft???

    Reply
  8. Brian says

    September 17, 2025 at 5:05 am

    When something is changed (fuel selector) which causes an adverse reaction, reverse the action right away ! 🤔

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines