• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pilot loses control during aborted landing

By General Aviation News Staff · October 15, 2025 · 4 Comments

The pilot was attempting to land on a constrained turf runway in Asheville, Alabama.

A witness told investigators that the Mustang II approached the runway too fast, landed long, and bounced several times.

The pilot aborted the landing with limited runway remaining.

The witness noted the airplane “staggered into the air” at a high pitch angle with the wings rocking left and right.

The pilot told investigators that the airplane’s nose “dropped” before it hit the ground.

Based on this information, it is likely that the pilot exceeded the airplane’s critical angle of attack during the aborted landing and subsequent initial climb, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and impact with terrain.

Probable Cause: The pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane during initial climb after an aborted landing, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and impact with terrain.

NTSB Identification: 193331

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This October 2023 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Jerry Kemp says

    October 27, 2025 at 7:19 am

    Another beautiful airplane bites the dust! Sad!

    Reply
  2. ET says

    October 16, 2025 at 10:35 am

    The main issue here? Perhaps a loose nut behind the wheel?

    Reply
  3. JimH in CA says

    October 15, 2025 at 5:27 pm

    Per AOPA Airports and Airnav, the runway is 1,800 ft long, not 3,900 ft.!
    My Cessna would need over 1,100 ft ground run on turf and a warm day, so not much altitude at the end of the runway.!
    I don’t know how a low power Mustang2 would do.?

    Reply
    • Warren Webb Jr says

      October 16, 2025 at 6:59 am

      If I found the correct performance reference, landing distance is similar to a Skyhawk with takeoff performance quite a bit better than the Skyhawk. But from what is mentioned in the report, the main issues were landing too long and aborting too late (plus pitch control on the abort).

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines