• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Plane hits sign and taxi light after hard landing

By General Aviation News Staff · December 31, 2025 · 9 Comments

The right seat pilot reported that after performing a preflight inspection, he anticipated the Beech A36 would need to be refueled and subsequently left the fuel caps unlocked. After a discussion with the left seat pilot (who was acting as the pilot in command), they decided they would not need to refuel before the flight. Both pilots performed another walk-around inspection and neither pilot noticed that the fuel caps remained unlocked.

Shortly after takeoff from the airport in Sidney, Ohio, the right seat pilot noticed that both fuel caps were not secure, and that fuel was escaping from both main fuel tanks. He elected to return to the airport and land on the opposite direction runway.

The pilots were both manipulating the controls when they landed the airplane “hard” on the main landing gear. The airplane then bounced and veered to the right of the runway, hitting a terminal sign and taxi light.

The hard landing and subsequent runway excursion resulted in substantial damage to the wings and fuselage.

Probable Cause: The pilots’ improper landing flare, which resulted in a hard landing, runway excursion, and subsequent impact with a terminal sign and taxi light.

NTSB Identification: 193518

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This December 2023 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. David Ward Sandidge says

    January 3, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    Who’s on first? Yes. And What’s on second. Yes. I don’t know who’s on third. Yes, I Don’t Know Who. What?

    Reply
  2. DA says

    January 3, 2026 at 11:31 am

    These two gray-haired** clowns had no business flying this plane. Lots of blank spaces on the 6120, so let me help the pilots a bit on the “Aircraft Damage section: Destroyed.

    In their haste to get back to the airport, the ultra-impossible turn was employed at low airspeed and low altitude. An aerobatic pilot wouldn’t have attempted that turn. I agree that another 30 seconds of flight would have radically changed the outcome, but these guys reached into the luck bag that had run out. They are lucky they weren’t killed.

    ** I am also gray haired, and I have enough experience being at accident scenes and having first hand knowledge of accidents to know that the older one gets, particularly in cases where flight time has been limited, complacency and arrogance often gets the better of pilots. These two were not proficient, and relied on past flight time as a substitute for currency. To compound matters, too many cooks spoil the broth: Two on the flight controls was the additional ingredient for the disaster that followed. Neither should ever be allowed to fly again, unless as a back seat passenger.

    Reply
  3. Michael Gorman says

    January 3, 2026 at 7:10 am

    Beechcraft gear are immensely strong. Back in 1947 Beech tested the gear by dropping them from ten feet I believe. Makes you wonder how hard these guys hit to break them like that.

    Reply
  4. are cee says

    January 3, 2026 at 6:19 am

    Proving yet again, anyone can learn to fly, but not everyone can become an aviator.

    Reply
  5. Shary says

    January 2, 2026 at 10:47 am

    Sounds like a couple of 709 flights are (or should be) the order of the day!

    Reply
  6. Leigh says

    January 2, 2026 at 10:38 am

    Sam Parsons says it best! Except should be no insurance pay out because they weren’t legal to be flying! They missed the old saying when you think you have an emergency “ smoke a cigarette”. They took what they thought was an emergency and made it one.
    Folks just fly the plane, door open, fuel cap off what ever the problem just slow down.
    Folks if your not flying an hour a week your not current anyway, that’s the minimum per year!

    Reply
    • m pilot says

      January 3, 2026 at 5:07 am

      “… should be no insurance pay out because they weren’t legal to be flying!”. Exactly Leigh. Insurance company should claim coverage as null and void if not current on flight review, Same as not in annual and no legit ferry permit..

      Reply
  7. Sam Parsons says

    January 2, 2026 at 5:02 am

    Good grief, the NTSB learns that both were operating the controls during landing with no positive exchange of controls and yet says the cause is the landing flare? They also learn that it has been over 5 years since a flight review! Yikes, what about having two 1000+ hour pilots flying illegally trying to land the same airplane at the same time? Another insurance payout impacting all of us by those who should not be flying at all.

    Reply
  8. Paul Brevard says

    January 1, 2026 at 9:03 am

    A young, but very good flight instructor once told me “never make a relatively minor problem a decidedly imminent major problem simply for the sake of expediency.” Another 30 seconds of climb could have provided a much different outcome in this case.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines