• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Plane Crashes On Way to Overdue Annual Inspection

By General Aviation News Staff · April 24, 2026 · 10 Comments

The pilot told investigators he was taking his Beech B24R to get an annual inspection at another airport. He performed a preflight inspection of the airplane, started the engine, and checked the magnetos before departing the Flying W Airport (N14) in Lumberton Township, New Jersey. Once the airplane became airborne, it did not climb very well and began to settle back towards the ground with the landing gear still extended.

A witness said the airplane’s engine was “sputtering” as it was trying to climb and sounded like there was a significant drop in RPM. The airplane stalled and hit a field off the end of the runway.

A post-accident examination of the airplane revealed that the lower fuselage sustained substantial damage. The pilot sustained minor injuries in the crash.

Examination of the engine revealed low compression on the No. 2 cylinder. The cylinder was examined with a borescope and carbon build-up was noted. The intake valve was not sealing, and the valve seat appeared to be cracked.

A review of the maintenance records revealed the last annual inspection on the engine was completed on May 14, 2014, at a total time of 1,469.2 hours since overhaul. At the time of the accident, on April 22, 2024, the airplane had accrued about 16 hours since the last annual inspection.

Per Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 91.409(a), an aircraft must undergo an annual maintenance inspection every 12 calendar months to be legal to operate. 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix D, outlines the scope and detail of items that must be checked during the annual inspection of reciprocating engine aircraft. This regulation is critical for ensuring the airworthiness of aircraft by mandating comprehensive inspections of various systems and components, including the engine.

Probable Cause: The pilot/owner’s failure to ensure adequate maintenance of the airplane, which resulted in a partial loss of engine power during takeoff.

NTSB Identification: 194139

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This April 2024 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Steve says

    April 28, 2026 at 4:45 pm

    Everyone speculating on what “the Insurance Company might think or do.” Most likely there was no insurance company — too long out of Annuals or currency, and no law in many states requiring insurance!

    Reply
  2. Scott Patterson says

    April 28, 2026 at 5:27 am

    Yet despite it all it crashed for the same reasons perfectly up to snuff and compliance aircraft do.

    Reply
  3. rwyerosk says

    April 27, 2026 at 2:51 pm

    This gets better……

    The aircraft is not registered any longer …..!

    I would say this fellow
    Not current
    No 91.411 and 413 certs….
    Has no medical
    No flight Review
    No insurance

    Reply
  4. Nate D'Anna says

    April 27, 2026 at 11:41 am

    It will be interesting to see what the FAA does with the owner considering that the plane was illegally flown as a result of being out of annual. This is totally irresponsible as innocent people on the ground were put in jeopardy, the pilot could have died, the airplane was wrecked, and the insurance company has a claim—-or does it? Would it surprise you that in consideration of all this, the plane may not have been insured?

    Reply
  5. DA says

    April 27, 2026 at 7:51 am

    Only a truly negligent pilot would have flown a plane 10 years out of annual without a rigorous inspection prior. Know how I am right? He crashed.

    Reply
  6. rwyerosk says

    April 27, 2026 at 6:22 am

    I should add that this engine is fuel injected and the fuel injection servo could have failed because the internal rubber parts get dry and crack……

    Reply
  7. rwyerosk says

    April 27, 2026 at 6:19 am

    He should eat the loss. He is nothing short of a moron and the FAA should at least REVOKE his certificate.

    Owner like this is what gives G/A a bad name.

    He risked hurting innocents on the ground because of his negligence …….

    BYT a ferry permit and inspection by a mechanic could have fixed the issues and the accident would have been prevented

    You are. a fool sir!!!!!!!and I use the term sir loosely….

    Reply
  8. Scott Patterson says

    April 27, 2026 at 5:14 am

    It was working and then it wasn’t. Sounds like the fuel contamination which is more of a preflight issue.

    Reply
  9. Jerry Sorrell says

    April 24, 2026 at 8:49 am

    NTSB report cylinder #2 was 30/80
    Also noted water and debris in Rt tank.

    Reply
  10. Jerry Sorrell says

    April 24, 2026 at 8:33 am

    Would a pre flight inspection for ferry permit have caught this? Depends on the extent of engine borescope exam, fuel filters, fresh fuel, full power run up, etc.
    What was low compression? 61/80 or 30/80? The plane was “way out” of annual and would require more detailed review to ferry as compared to a plane a week.out of annual. What about a review of any critical A/D’s? And the insurance company’s opinion of a ferry flight?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines