• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Aeronca Crashes in River

By General Aviation News Staff · June 9, 2026 · Leave a Comment

Recovered Aeronca 7AC fuselage showing left wing damage after river ditching.
The Aeronca after being recovered from the river.

According to the pilot, the Aeronca 7AC was fueled before the flight, with the fuel gauge confirming that the tank was full. The flight departed from Brunswick Executive Airport (KBXM) in Maine about 0915.

He remained in the traffic pattern and operated from the grass runway for about 45 minutes to ensure the engine and other systems were operating normally. He then proceeded to fly south over the Androscoggin and Kennebec rivers at about 500 feet to 600 feet AGL toward Popham Beach before flying over open water to Two Bush Islands, where he increased his altitude to about 1,500 feet. He then turned north again and followed the Androscoggin River again until he passed the dam near Downeaster.

After about 90 minutes of uneventful flying, he decided to return to the departure airport. He began a climbing 180° right turn with the engine at full power. About 90° through the turn, the engine began to “hesitate” and the RPM was “decreasing.”

The pilot told investigators that the engine lost thrust, but it continued to idle. He attempted to troubleshoot the loss of engine power by applying carburetor heat and manipulating the throttle, however engine power did not return.

He decided to perform a forced landing in the Androscoggin River based on the airplane’s altitude and the unfavorable surrounding terrain. As he descended towards the river, he recalled cracking open the cabin door, tightening the shoulder harness, and reducing airspeed. The airplane hit the water and immediately nosed over. The cabin quickly filled with water, but the pilot was able to orient himself and escape. He sustained minor injuries in the crash.

The airplane was recovered from the river, which revealed substantial damage to the left wing.

A post-accident examination of the airplane’s fuel system and engine was conducted. The engine crankshaft was initially seized from corrosion, however, after moving it back and forth to break up the corrosion, it was able to rotate fully.

Compression on all four cylinders was established, and a borescope inspection did not identify any preaccident discrepancies. Both magnetos were removed and the left magneto produced spark during impulse coupling operation. The spark plugs were removed and were corroded consistent with water immersion. There were no obstructions within the induction system. The fuel tank contained ¼ of a tank of fuel. Water was present in the fuel system. The carburetor was disassembled and an unknown “white gummy” substance was found within the fuel bowl, which was also obstructing the main fuel jet.

A sample of the unknown substance was sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory for analysis. The sample was examined using a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. The residue displayed spectral peaks that corresponded to particular functional groups found within molecular structure of the unknown material. The spectrum was consistent with presence of an amine and a carbohydrate. A spectral library search was performed on the unknown spectrum. The spectral search found a few spectral similarities to cellulose. A mixture search was also performed. There were matches to several other natural nitrogen-containing material sources.

Based on the combination of spectral patterns and similarities to several natural amino-carbohydrates and other materials, the analysis concluded that the unknown material was most likely plant material or other naturally occurring cellulosic material. Plant or leaf material consists of a combination of carbon, nitrogen, carbohydrates, organic acids, mineral substances, and water. Molecular bonds for these materials were all present within the unknown spectrum. The presence of the elemental carbon in the sample indicates that the material had sustained some type of thermal exposures carbonizing the material.

The owner stated that the accident flight was the first flight after the airplane’s second annual inspection, after an extensive airframe restoration and major engine overhaul. A review of the maintenance logbooks revealed that the fuel tank was emptied and flushed during the most recent annual inspection on May 6, 2024, just over a month before the accident. The logbook entry stated, “Inspected and cleaned fuel strainer, carb inlet screen and flushed carb fuel bowl as needed. Leak check performed; no leaks noted.”

At the time of the accident, the air temperature was 66.2°F and the dewpoint was 42.8°F, which were conducive to the formation of serious icing at glide power according to a carburetor icing probability chart.

Probable Cause: A total loss of engine power due to carburetor icing as a result of the pilot’s delayed application of carburetor heat.

NTSB Identification: 194822

To download the final report. Click here. This will trigger a PDF download to your device.

This June 2024 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

NTSB Report - One Accident. One Lesson.

NTSB Report delivers one NTSB accident report per email, Monday through Friday — so pilots can learn from real-world outcomes. Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines