• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Production miracles built the American Air Armada in World War II

By Frederick Johnsen · March 2, 2020 ·

The miracle of production capacity that saw the United States build about 35,000 four-engine bombers during World War II, along with 50,000 fighters and thousands of medium bombers, transports and trainers, was a juggernaut with many moving parts.

In the first full year of American participation in the war, military and industrial planners faced demands on a scale never before contemplated. 

For key strategic bombers, multiple assembly lines were required to meet the need. Suppliers poured a steady stream of parts and subassemblies into the mix, with railroads and trucks carrying vital pieces to the prime contractors’ assembly lines around the U.S.

Air Force statisticians and historians captured numbers that paint a picture of a monumental wartime effort. Including the lead-up to war beginning in the last half of 1940 and concluding at the end of August 1945, American industry built nearly 300,000 military aircraft, supported by production of more than 800,000 engines and more than 800,000 propellers. The combined weight of all the airframes and spare parts was calculated at more than 2.8 billion pounds. All that tonnage came at a price approaching $45 billion, nearly one-fourth of the total American munitions program.

During 1940 as American manufacturers realized the first glimpses of increased production orders for military aircraft, only about 6,000 military airplanes were built, along with perhaps 7,000 civilian aircraft. By 1944, with wartime production at peak levels, more than 96,000 military aircraft were built, generally more complicated and larger than those of 1940.

This prewar B-17C under construction in 1940 shows the individualized handbuilt nature of many aircraft before mass production techniques were harnessed to meet the fantastic needs of wartime. (Boeing photo via Tom Cole)

Early in the war, the creation of new combat units absorbed as many aircraft as could be rolled out into the sunshine. All too soon, it also became necessary to produce aircraft to replace those lost in combat and accidents.

The global nature of the conflict and the evolving tactics of friend and foe demanded a continual evolution of aircraft designs and equipment, sometimes tailored to the needs of specific combat theaters.

It soon became apparent that it was impractical to introduce the latest changes, especially those tailored for only some theaters, on the assembly line. This would slow production. A network of pools for new aircraft and modification centers was set up in the United States to allow a semi-frozen design to be produced en masse, and tweaked at a separate facility with the necessary upgrades until those changes could be introduced on the production line without halting work.

A key example of this is the tail gun emplacement on the Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress. The first G-models used the same tail gun setup that had been introduced on the B-17E back in 1941. That was another epoch earlier compared to the war being fought by the B-17G in 1944. A new tail gun station that provided a larger cone of fire and better visibility for the gunner was devised, but initially G-models flew away from the Seattle plant with the outdated gun emplacement as an economy of time. These brand new B-17Gs arrived at a modification center operated by United Airlines in Cheyenne, Wyoming, where the old tail cap came off and the new version was attached before sending the bombers off to Europe for combat. The United facility performed other upgrades, saving time in the overall production of B-17s.

For the cameras, Boeing workers manually pushed the 5,000th B-17 built in Seattle since Pearl Harbor out the doors of Plant 2. They previously covered the bomber’s bare aluminum skin with their painted signatures. But the bomber, nicknamed “5 Grand”, traveled to a modification center for the latest upgrades before entering combat over Europe. (Boeing photo)

Even so, B-17s destined for the Eighth Air Force in England received the attention of thousands of mechanics who made sure they were up to date before entering combat, further streamlining the stateside production flow.

In the Pacific, B-25 Mitchell bombers received modifications in the field to render them more useful as strafers for low-level attacks. This post-production tinkering may have been fostered by the Fifth Air Force commander, General George Kenney, an engineer by background.

The B-25C Mortimer of the 3rd Bomb Group, 5th Air Force, was a combat veteran when crews in the Pacific added more guns to the nose and sides of the fuselage to enhance Mortimer’s lethality for ground attack sorties, a strong point of Pacific B-25 operations. (North American Aviation)

The B-24, a globetrotting bomber built in greater numbers than any other American warplane, was serviced by seven modification centers around the United States before heading overseas. Later in the war as modification centers emphasized completing B-29 Superfortresses, B-24s were parked in pools around the country awaiting modification line space. By January 1945 more than 900 new B-24s awaited mods; by VJ-Day more than 400 new B-24s were in stateside storage locations, according to Liberator historian Allan G. Blue.

When the Ford Motor Company became part of the military aircraft construction pool, Ford engineers hoped their years of experience in automobile mass production would serve the company’s aviation interests as well. But initially, the auto making giant faced some hurdles unique to the construction of aluminum aircraft instead of steel automobiles. When Ford commenced construction of B-24 Liberators as an adjunct to Convair, Convair engineers had to step in quickly to advise their Ford counterparts that, unlike car fenders, the holes drilled in aluminum aircraft parts could not be oversized or elongated to enable hand-fitting.  

But the Ford B-24 plant introduced other automated devices that accelerated production later. Ford became so proficient at building Liberators that by 1945, the five assembly lines building B-24s had been reduced to only two — the Convair home plant in San Diego and Ford at Willow Run, Michigan.

Aircraft manufacturers ramped up their mass production techniques in advance of American entry into the war. This enabled the task of building aircraft to be accomplished by workers including those of limited previous skills. This was a crucial advantage as the wartime draft claimed so many young men. Older men and women and those deemed unsuitable for military service gained employment in aircraft plants where their work did much to win the war. 

A brand-new Convair PB4Y-2 Privateer patrol bomber was fitted with a temporary nose cap for ferrying from the San Diego factory to Litchfield Park, Arizona, for nose turret and bombardier station installation. (Convair photo)

When aircraft manufacturers complained about losing skilled technicians to the draft, the Army Air Forces secured deferments for many. (My father, Carl Johnsen, told a story about being on a bus destined for an induction center when a man with a clipboard entered the bus, calling out for Carl Johnsen, and said he was needed at Northrop instead and should return to his job. We’ll never know how much of a factor in his selection was his age – he was 29 when Pearl Harbor was attacked – but Dad’s contribution to the war effort was drafting at Northrop, the start of an aerospace career that spanned four decades.)

The manufacturers wrestled with initial shortages of machine tools and a lingering concern over aluminum scarcity even as they increased the tempo of aircraft delivery. At the peak of production in 1944, 16 B-17G Flying Fortresses were completed during each one-day 20-hour work shift.

“At the peak of production in 1944, 16 B-17G aircraft were completed during each one-day 20-hour work shift. This photograph shows the completed aircraft, the results of one work day, being routed along Boeing’s Seattle plant concourse. East Marginal Way, which separates the Boeing plant from the airfield, was closed for security reasons during the war. U.S. military officials denied release of this photo during the war for fear of providing the enemy with reliable aircraft production numbers. In the upper portion of the photo, small white air raid shelters dot the flight apron”. (Caption and photo from 1985 Boeing media kit during B-17 50th anniversary celebrations in Seattle.)

Even in full-swing production, variances existed from warplane to warplane on the same assembly line. Some parts, like wing-fuselage fairings, were shipped undrilled, to be hand-fitted on an airplane.

So the next time you see a pristine restored B-17, ponder the many-layered miracle of production that led to its completion in the war years. It was never a frozen design, and it participated in modifications before final delivery to make it the most current iteration of the basic airplane.  

About Frederick Johnsen

Fred Johnsen is a product of the historical aviation scene in the Pacific Northwest. The author of numerous historical aviation books and articles, Fred was an Air Force historian and curator. Now he devotes his energies to coverage for GAN as well as the Airailimages YouTube Channel. You can reach him at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Alice Carroll says

    January 5, 2021 at 4:06 pm

    You made a good point that I should always take into account the material shortages that happened when it comes to the production of aircraft during wartime. I’m currently studying the evolution of World War 2 aircraft in order to have a better understanding of war tactics. I think gaining such knowledge will help me write more realistic novels in the future.

  2. Greg Wilson says

    March 3, 2020 at 3:18 pm

    While the Boeing, Vega, Douglas team were producing 16 B-17s per 20 hour shift, the Michigan Willow Run plant alone was producing a B-24 every hour. The challenges were great leading to the moniker “will-it-run” yet when the system was fully developed and the production line was full it worked.

  3. Gaye Lyn says

    March 3, 2020 at 12:04 pm

    This is an incredible story…made even more poignant by your dad’s involvement. I had no idea about multiple manufacturing locations for a single aircraft type. The continuous engineering and ingenuity that facilitated the accomplishments of that era stand as tribute to our heritage. Thanks for the story.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines