• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Eberhart: Somebody else’s airplanes

By Frederick Johnsen · June 30, 2024 · 1 Comment

The sturdy little S.E. 5 from World War I flew with the U.S. Army Air Service into the 1920s when modified and rebuilt as the S.E. 5E, remanufactured by the Eberhart Steel Products Co. (Army Air Service photo from the Gerald Balzer collection)

The Eberhart Steel Products Co. of Buffalo, New York, jockeyed for business during the post World War I slump in military contracts.

Formed in 1918 to make airplane parts, Eberhart gained a U.S. Army Air Service contract in 1922 to rebuild 50 British S.E. 5A biplane fighters, identifying the rebuilds as S.E. 5E models.

The work included skinning the fuselages in plywood and mounting Wright-Hispano engines in the refurbished fighters that served the post-war Air Service as training planes.

Eberhart also contracted to rebuild and re-engine French SPAD S.XIII biplanes in the American Air Service. The SPAD’s original 220-horsepower geared Hispano engine was proving troublesome, so the Eberhart SPAD conversions used 180-horsepower direct-drive Hispano-E motors, with a lower thrust line that necessitated a redesigned nose cowl and radiator for the Eberhart variants, sometimes identified as the Eberhart 13E.

One of the Eberhart-modified SPAD 13Es showed its broad, flat new radiator in near profile in this view from the 1920s taken at Langley Field in Virginia. (U.S. Army Air Service photo)

The Eberhart SPADs, even homelier than the original French iteration, gave the nascent Air Service useful trainers into the 1920s.

But just as the Air Service knew these Eberhart conversions were stopgap measures until newer designs could be brought into service, so did Eberhart set its sights on creating something new in the way of aircraft designs. In 1925, the Eberhart Aeroplane and Motor Co. emerged as a subsidiary of Eberhart Steel.

Two years later, the Eberhart Aeroplane enterprise produced an original design, the XFG-1 experimental single-seat biplane fighter. In U.S. Navy parlance of the day, the letter G was assigned to Eberhart to designate naval aircraft it built. The X denoted experimental and the F said this was a fighter.

The rotunda of the U.S. capitol building is faintly visible over the aft fuselage of the Eberhart Comanche resting in the waters of Naval Air Station Anacostia in 1928. (Thomas E Doll via the Gerald Balzer collection)

With Eberhart’s subsequent demise as a company, the letter G was re-assigned several times to other companies before finding a home as the designator for Goodyear-built aircraft.

The Eberhart FG-1, sometimes identified as the Comanche, was a tidy and conventional 1920s design. Its fuselage was built of welded steel tube. The wings featured an aluminum frame.

The original span of the larger upper wing was 28 feet, 9 inches. The upper wing of the FG-1 swept back just over 7°, the lower wing swept forward just over 5°.

Wrapped in silver-doped fabric, the FG-1 and its outgrowth F2G-1 version mounted a single Pratt and Whitney Wasp air-cooled radial engine of 425 horsepower, swinging a Hamilton-Standard two-blade metal propeller. It rested on a traditional landing gear common to that era.

A hangar proclaims this Eberhart Comanche to be at the Army’s Bolling Field near the Navy Anacostia facility in the District of Columbia. (Thomas E. Doll via the Gerald Balzer collection)

The Eberhart Comanche probably had a top speed around 155 mph. That compares with the contemporary Boeing F2B, which clocked a top speed of 158 mph at sea level.

The FG-1’s arrival on the scene in 1927 dipped it in the air-minded frenzy of the year that Charles Lindbergh flew solo from New York to Paris.

But the Navy did not order Eberhart fighters in quantity, staying with old reliables like Boeing and Curtiss.

Serial number lists compiled by the Navy show only one assigned to Eberhart, A-7944, for the sole XFG-1 of 1927. Evidently it retained this number when rebuilt as the XF2G-1 the following year.

This photo has been variously identified as the XFG-1 or its modified XF2G-1 version of the Eberhart Comanche, a trim 1927 naval fighter design that did not attain a production contract. (U.S. Navy via the Gerald Balzer collection)

Photos show the biplane with a barely-discernible logo on the fuselage proclaiming it to be the Eberhart Comanche, with apparently a Native American’s profile in the center of the circular badge.

Photos and documentation on the Eberhart fighter are sparse. Some captions associated with the same photograph list it as either the FG-1 or the modified F2G-1.

It is generally accepted that the XF2G was demonstrated in 1928 with a single main float and two small floats near each lower wingtip in an era when the Navy still considered fighters on floats to be viable warplanes.

View of the Eberhart fighter on its single centerline pontoon shows a lack of U.S. national star insignia on the upper wing. The company’s Comanche logo adorns the fuselage. (Thomas E. Doll via the Gerald Balzer collection)

The XF2G-1 crashed in March 1928 at the Navy’s Anacostia facility in Washington, D.C., ending Eberhart’s adventures in building an original aircraft design.

The company subsequently concentrated on its stock in trade, making metal parts for aircraft produced by other manufacturers.

About Frederick Johnsen

Fred Johnsen is a product of the historical aviation scene in the Pacific Northwest. The author of numerous historical aviation books and articles, Fred was an Air Force historian and curator. Now he devotes his energies to coverage for GAN as well as the Airailimages YouTube Channel. You can reach him at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily. Sign up here.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bernard Robertson says

    July 1, 2024 at 8:11 am

    I just love Fred’s occasional articles in GAN and I always learn something new.
    (I do think it’s a little unkind to call the original SPAD homely however. Some of us think they’re beautiful!).

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Bernard Robertson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines