• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Another reader worries his engine is a ticking time bomb

By Paul McBride · October 27, 2025 · 8 Comments

A Piper PA-32R-301. (Photo by Ronnie Macdonald via Wikipedia)

Question for Paul McBride, the General Aviation News engines expert: I thoroughly enjoyed your article, “Is this engine a ticking time bomb?”

Here are some facts regarding my aircraft:

  • 2004 Piper PA32R-301, S/N 3246204
  • Total time: 2,370 hours
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-540-K1G5, S/N L-28209-48A
  • Time since new: 2,370 hours

Regarding cylinder maintenance:

  • Number six cylinder was removed and replaced with an overhauled cylinder at 687 hours
  • Number two cylinder was removed and overhauled at 2,307 hours
  • All cylinder compressions are 64 or better
  • Engine oil analysis results from Aviation Oil are within normal limits
  • I burn one quart of oil every 2.2 hours

I ordered a factory-rebuilt engine from Air Power on July 20, 2023, with an expected delivery by March 2024. However, the arrival date has now been delayed to late October 2025.

I fly about 30 hours a month, mostly to the Bahamas — yes, lots of open water.

My question is: Is my engine a ticking time bomb? Should I consider overhauling the remaining five cylinders?

I look forward to your suggestions and advice. Your expertise and 40-year experience with Lycoming are truly impressive.

Robert, via email

Paul’s Answer:

Robert, from the information you’ve provided, I’d say you have done an excellent job of keeping on top of maintenance issues, such as the two cylinders you replaced. That would indicate to me that you are doing routine maintenance and investigating any potential issues.

I honestly do not think your engine is a “ticking time bomb,” but due to its age and the flight envelope it’s used for, I’d be keeping a closer eye for anything that appears different from what you usually see on the instrument panel, as well as any changes in sound during operation.

I highly recommend that you continue to do your frequent oil and filter changes, including the oil analysis, hot differential compression checks, etc.

Your oil consumption is probably better than average with the number of hours you have on your engine.

My gut feeling is that unless you see something change, you’re good to go, but just stay on top of things.

I feel pretty confident that because you fly about 30 hours a month, you would be very much aware if there were any small changes in the engine’s performance that would alert you that something has changed and you’d better look into it immediately.

I hope my response will serve as a guideline for continuing your engine in service until the replacement engine arrives. Hopefully, that will be soon, and you can continue to fly for many more hours.

About Paul McBride

Paul McBride, an expert on engines, retired after almost 40 years with Lycoming.

Send your questions to [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become a better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. William J Pulkinen says

    November 1, 2025 at 9:45 am

    Querry why no discussion on using a borescope for periodic inspection of valves, cylinders etc

    Reply
    • JimH in CA says

      November 1, 2025 at 2:58 pm

      I did mention using a borescope to evaluate the valves, the crosshatch and piston crown.
      But the crank, rods and bearings can’t be looked at. Oil pressure and temperature as well as the engine making the book power can give an indication that the engine is good to go.

      Reply
  2. Andy says

    November 1, 2025 at 4:49 am

    Every engine is a ticking time bomb. It’s just where you are on the timer you are. What matters are the fundamentals. Power, performance, temps, fuel flow, oil consumption, leaks, borescope, compression, metal in the filter. If your engine has ten hours or two thousand thesebtell a story. Had a customer who’s engine met all the above criteria but at 2600 SMOH it went bang. Threw a rod through the case. They landed safely on a field but the core was ruined and cost him an extra 15k.

    Reply
  3. John Van Etten says

    October 28, 2025 at 8:13 am

    Buy a twin.

    Reply
    • Toni G. says

      October 28, 2025 at 2:19 pm

      Accident rate for twins is at least 4x higher than single engine.

      Reply
  4. rwyerosk says

    October 28, 2025 at 7:49 am

    Simple………Do not fly the aircraft….especially over water out of gliding distance of land…

    StOP!!!!!!

    Reply
  5. HENRY COOPER says

    October 28, 2025 at 5:43 am

    If rings were broken or the cylinder wall was scored, it’s doubtful that a differential compression test would be as high as 64 over 80!

    Reply
  6. JimH in CA says

    October 27, 2025 at 11:45 am

    I would recommend that he borescope the cylinders to see the condition of the valves and look at the cylinder walls, for glazing or scoring from possible broken rings. Or, the rings are just very worn with that many hours on them.!

    Using oil at 2.2 hrs per qt is quite high and If it was a TCM engine, they state that it is not airworthy if oil use is 2 hrs per qt., or lower.

    Oil pressure or static power were not mentioned…other airworthy items.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines