• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Can I Boost My Engine’s Horsepower?

By Paul McBride · May 4, 2026 · 6 Comments

A 1964 Piper PA-28-235. (Photo by Tomas Del Toro)

Question for Paul McBride, the General Aviation News engine expert: I would like your thoughts about the following: One of my customers has a Piper PA-28-235 that’s coming up for an overhaul. He would like to convert his engine, a Lycoming O-540-B, to a high compression engine to make a 250-hp engine.

I know the spray boys have done this in the past with their PA-25-235 aircraft.

I searched for an STC for this conversion but haven’t been able to locate one. I don’t know if one exists or not.

Last thing: I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoy your column in General Aviation News. Keep up the good work.

Jim Kjeldgaard
Fremont Aviation

Paul’s Answer

First of all, Jim, I’d like to thank you for your kind comments regarding the joy you get from reading my column. I can only hope the column serves to educate our readers as well and maybe even dispel some of the controversial subjects that come up when folks are hangar flying.

I’d like to add a little caveat here while we are talking about hangar flying. I would highly recommend that for any subject that comes up during one of these round tables of knowledge that it is essential to read the manufacturer’s publications, such as the Engine Operator’s Manual and the Pilots Operating Handbook, for the aircraft. Most maintenance or operational subjects will be covered in the respective publications from the manufacturer.

Now to your question: I’m aware that the conversion of the Lycoming O-540-B series 235-horsepower engines has been done in the past. I also did some searching for an STC and had no success either. But I know there are STCs out there to do this upgrade conversion.

I believe that an FAA authorized repair station also could possibly make this conversion using FAA Form 337.

I’d suggest checking first with your local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO). They may be able to offer guidance as to where to find more information about this conversion.

When this conversion is made, they remove the 7.20:1 compression ratio pistons and replace them with the 8.50:1 compression ratio pistons. While still maintaining the rated 2,575 rpm, that should give you 250 horsepower.

The one important thing to keep in mind is there would also be a need to adjust the carburetor’s fuel schedule upwards in order to support the increase in horsepower.

As the old saying goes, there is no such thing as a free lunch!

I’ll counter that by saying the two least expensive things you can put in your engine are gas and oil.

About Paul McBride

Paul McBride, an expert on engines, retired after almost 40 years with Lycoming.

Send your questions to [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become a better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Gary Schaffer says

    May 5, 2026 at 5:27 am

    Paul, I read your response to the question and in the final sentence found the nugget of gold… I was just contemplating an auto gas STC. Your comment made me rethink that issue… I will continue to fill up with 100LL and add TCP. The risks of vapor lock and turning myself into a crispy critter because of static electricity aren’t worth it.

    Reply
  2. jim in ca says

    May 4, 2026 at 11:42 am

    Also, note that the fuel requirement will go from 80/87 to 100LL …but since only 100LL is available….no change. just a placard change at the tank fillers.

    The displacement is the same with the new pistons, so I don’t understand having to make any mixture changes ?
    And, the CHTs can run a bit hotter, so baffles should be checked.

    Reply
  3. Wing Smith says

    May 4, 2026 at 11:37 am

    Increasing the CR improves the “fuel specific power” of an engine. The pounds of fuel/HP/hr is reduced when the CR is raised.
    The increased power comes from the increased efficiency the higher CR provides.
    This means more power is produced from the same amount of air and fuel.
    The displacement volume is not changed but the compressed volume is reduced so
    the actual working volume of the engine is reduced slightly which would call for a very small reduction in fuel required.

    Reply
    • JS says

      May 5, 2026 at 5:26 am

      You need to increase the fuel rate as a higher CR creates more heat. While these are “Air Cooled Engines”, they also cool with fuel, especially at higher throttle settings. That’s why the carb has an enrichner valve, aka, economizer valve, in the carb. It enriches to cool with fuel.

      Reply
      • wing smith says

        May 5, 2026 at 11:08 am

        JS, When the CR is raised, the engine has a higher expansion ratio during the power stroke. This has a cooling effect that is much greater than the extra heat during the compression cycle. Overall the engine will run cooler at the same power output with higher CR. This is why Diesel engines run much cooler.

        Reply
        • jimh in ca says

          May 5, 2026 at 12:59 pm

          yup, true….who knew.? with higher thermodynamic efficiency, extracting more work from the combustion process leaves less heat energy in the exhaust gases.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines