• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Print Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

The Fokker Scourge

By Frederick Johnsen · May 27, 2026 · 2 Comments

A Fokker Eindecker, tipped on its nose, shows the forward-firing machine gun that successfully fired through the propeller arc, giving rise to this aircraft’s brief air dominance as the “Fokker Scourge.” The view also shows the wings without ailerons, relying on warping for control inputs. (Photo from the National Archives)

Anthony Fokker’s Eindecker fighter of 1915 briefly gave the Germans a startling edge in air combat in World War I.

With panache, the British press coined the term Fokker Scourge to characterize the era when the Eindeckers were the only warplanes fitted with a synchronizer to enable the fighter’s machine gun to fire through the propeller arc. This revolutionized air-to-air combat.

Before this fire synchronizer, some World War I aircraft inelegantly had steel plates attached to the blades of the propeller to deflect any errant rounds that might strike the prop. The French and British later caught up with gun synchronizers of their own.

The air dominance of the Fokkers was over by mid-1916 as they were overwhelmed by French Nieuport 11 fighters that had maneuvering advantages and placed a forward-firing machine gun on the top wing, mounted high enough to fire with no interruption over the top of the propeller arc.

A dive into the legend and lore of Anthony Fokker yields a still-vague and anecdotal characterization of a man who was acclaimed as a skilled pilot, while also verging on being a P.T. Barnum-esque promoter.

Anthony Fokker was photographed in the U.S. in the 1920s. His stature as an aviation pioneer is unquestioned, even if his biography gets a bit complicated based on stories he, and others, have told about his life and times. (Photo from the National Archives)

Fokker (whether the man or the company) gets credit for pushing forward-thinking designs like welded steel tube fuselages, minimal external wing bracing wires, and the first successful machine gun fire interrupter. These innovations helped put three of Fokker’s World War I fighters — the Eindecker, the Dr.I triplane, and the D.VII biplane — into the pantheon of warplanes of that era.

But some Fokker aircraft of World War I came under scrutiny for perceived lapses in construction quality. Even the iconic triplane suffered upper wing failures attributed to construction lapses at the time and later believed to be the result, at least in part, of a drastically higher lift coefficient for the top wing.

The Fokker World War I aircraft family tree, following the early success with the short-lived Eindecker of 1915, stumbled through several mediocre designs until the Dr.1 triplane of 1917 caught the attention of German pilots of the first rank, as well as their adversaries.

The Fokker Dr.I triplane was an ace-maker with occasional flaws that needed fixing. (Photo from the National Archives)

The Fokker triplane was maneuverable and climbed well, but was outclassed in speed. Its two .30-caliber Spandau machine guns, firing through the propeller arc, took their share of Allied aircraft.

Famously flown by Manfred Von Richthofen, the triplane also was the mount of choice for Werner Voss, who tallied a total of 48 victories, many while flying his triplane. A one-against-eight aerial battle that did not favor Voss led to his death on Sept. 23, 1917, with the loss of his Fokker Dr.1 triplane.

Quirks and all, the Dr.1 triplane earned respect for its abilities in the hands of good pilots. Construction of the triplanes totaled 320 aircraft.

The Fokker formula used welded steel tube fuselages and tail surfaces coupled to wooden wings, all fabric covered. Some generally lackluster designs followed the triplane until the Fokker D.VII biplane of 1918 pulled together the right mix of design and components to make a feared fighter in the last year of World War I.

One could persuasively argue the Fokker D.VII was the best fighter of World War I.

This Fokker D.VII was photographed with the engine cowling removed to show details of its powerplant. The D.VII represented the practical zenith of Fokker fighters. (Photo from the National Archives)

When fitted with a 185-horsepower BMW engine, the D.VII could attain 116 mph. The competitive French SPAD XIII could outrace the D.VIII at up to 130 mph, but the thicker wing airfoil of the Fokker gave it better handling that served pilots well in combat.

It is said the Fokker D.VII made good pilots out of unremarkable ones. That thick wing enabled the D.VII to hang on its prop, lingering longer at high angles of attack without stalling than opposing aircraft of the day. The thick wing structure also allowed for internal strength and minimal struts, with no flying wires needed.

Fokker F.VII trimotor aircraft flown by Richard E. Byrd over the North Pole in 1926.
This Fokker F.VII trimotor, duly emblazoned to leave no doubt of its origin, flew with Richard E. Byrd over the North Pole on May 9, 1926. (Photo from the Gerald Balzer collection)

Between 700 and 800 D.VIIs reached the front by the time the war ended in November 1918. Around 150 of them were subsequently appropriated by the U.S. Air Service and shipped to the United States.

The Fokker establishment had one more fighter in mind before the war ended. It was another monoplane, this time a parasol, labeled the Fokker D.VIII. Powered by a German Oberusel rotary engine of 110 horsepower, the D.VIII won a fly-off competition against several new warplanes in April 1918.

The clean lines and minimal drag of the Fokker D.VIII parasol fighter of 1918 represent the efforts of Fokker’s chief designer, Reinhold Platz. (Photo from the National Archives)

Climb rate, agility, and high-speed dives were in the repertoire of the D.VIII. But this capable late-war fighter suffered from its use of a rotary engine when a wartime shortage of the engine’s necessary castor oil lubricant led to engine stoppages and forced landings.

More vexing to all concerned were three D.VIII crashes due to failure of the parasol wing. Fokker blamed a German Army demand for changes in wing structure, while others said it was due to construction issues at the Fokker plant. The problems were ironed out, and D.VIIIs scored some victories late in the war, but the parasol fighter was soon out of a job with Germany’s defeat.

Tony Fokker moved to Holland after World War I, removing trainloads of aircraft and parts from Germany to jumpstart a new venture. By the mid-1920s, Fokker had conceived and delivered the airliner of the era, the Fokker Trimotor. Using Fokker’s tried-and-true formula of welded steel tube fuselage mated to a wooden wing, the Fokker F.VII trimotor and its successors, some built at a factory in the U.S., dominated the airline market in the last half of the 1920s, and gave Fokker a prosperous postwar era.

As stock sales eroded Anthony Fokker’s control over his business, he resigned in 1931. And the era of steel-tube-and-wood fabric-covered airliners was eclipsed by all-metal designs coming into vogue at that time.

Anthony Fokker’s persona and planes fired the imaginations of schoolboys who doodled versions of his trimotor on notebooks, and pondered his contributions.

Peter M. Bowers created this Of Wings & Things column in the 1970s after designing his own successful homebuilt aircraft, the Fly Baby. Pete’s mother told a story about young Pete, as a boy, declaring he wanted to be Anthony Fokker’s assistant. When asked why he didn’t just want to be the number one man, Pete said with the candor of childhood that it was because Fokker can’t go on forever.

Anthony Fokker died at age 49 in New York in 1939. Pneumococcal meningitis claimed the man who had challenged the skies as a daring aviator before World War I.

About Frederick Johnsen

Fred Johnsen is a product of the historical aviation scene in the Pacific Northwest. The author of numerous historical aviation books and articles, Fred was an Air Force historian and curator. Now he devotes his energies to coverage for GAN as well as the Airailimages YouTube Channel. You can reach him at [email protected].

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become a better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Joel Curtis says

    May 28, 2026 at 9:24 am

    Excellent article. I study military history after my brief time in the USAF. Fokker sure left his mark. Thank you.

    Reply
    • Frederick A. Johnsen says

      May 29, 2026 at 2:14 pm

      You are very welcome, Joel!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2026 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines